What's the Fate of Obamacare. . . Unconstitutional?

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Contact

The advocates of Obamacare are all wondering what an important new court decision means for the sweeping health care reform passed in March 2010. Late last week, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals held a key provision of health care reform is unconstitutional, which could make the law difficult to enforce. Obamacare contains a provision known as the "individual mandate," which requires individuals who do not have coverage through their employer to buy insurance or face an annual tax penalty which will be as high as $695 per year by 2016.

The 11th Circuit found that provision exceeds the constitutional authority of Congress, meaning that the federal government cannot force its citizens to buy insurance, and it cannot collect a penalty for citizens failing to do so. Many observers believe that if there is no penalty, there will be no incentive for uninsured individuals to obtain coverage.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide