When A Majority Won’t Suffice

Allen Matkins
Contact

For California corporations, the general rule is that an act or decision done or made by a majority of the directors present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present is the act of the board.  Cal. Corp. Code § 307(a)(8).  This general rule is not without its exceptions.  Two of these exceptions are found in the statute: Section 310 and Section 317(e).  Other exceptions take a little digging to discover.

Section 311 requires that a resolution designating a committee of the board be adopted by a majority of the authorized number of directors.  For example, the authorized number of directors may 7.  Assuming that the default quorum rule in Section 307(a)(7) applies, a quorum is 5 directors.  If only a quorum of directors is present, most actions and decisions could be taken by as few a three directors.  Under Section 311, however, all 5 directors would be required to designate a committee of the board.

Section 307(a)(8) establishes the rules for meetings at which a quorum is present.  Under Section 305(a), a vacancy (other than a vacancy created by removal) may be filled by “approval of the board”.  However, if the number of directors then in office is less than a quorum, the vacancy may be filled by:

  1. The unanimous written consent of the directors then in office,
  2. The affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office at a meeting held pursuant to notice or waivers of notice complying with Section 307, or
  3. A sole remaining directors.

The SEC’s Dark Side

On Monday, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had made a whistleblower award of $3.5 million.

  • Who received the award?  That information was redacted from the order.
  • What was the covered action?  That information was also redacted.
  • On whom were monetary sanctions imposed?  That information was also redacted.
  • What percentage of the monetary sanctions were awarded to the whistleblower?  That information was redacted.

Without knowing these basic facts, there is simply no accountability to the public for a government program that is handing out tens of millions of dollars to individuals.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Allen Matkins

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide