Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Contact
Share
Info
1101 K Street NW
10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005, United States
Phone: 202.371.2600
Fax: 202.371.2540
Areas Of Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • D.C.
Number of Attorneys
100+ Attorneys

Recent Updates at the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Recent changes at the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) have brought uncertainty to inter partes review and post-grant review practitioners before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). These procedural and…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

The Federal Circuit Expands IP Enforcement Opportunities at the ITC

Last month the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the Lashify case that significantly broadens the opportunity for companies to bring a lawsuit before the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”). The ITC is known for its…more
 /  Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade

IP Hot Topic: The Federal Circuit Confirms That Commission Cannot Be Compelled to Issue Sua Sponte Order

The Federal Circuit upheld the ITC Commission’s discretionary power not to issue sua sponte orders to show cause why a party has not committed sanctionable conduct under Commission Rules or to explain its reason for not issuing…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade, Science, Computers, & Technology

Hatch-Waxman Requires Patent Term Extension for Reissued Patents To Be Based on Original Patent

The Federal Circuit held in Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., 23-2254 that a reissued patent receives patent term extension (PTE) based on the issue date of the original patent, not the reissue patent,…more
 /  Administrative Law, Health, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Does Your Office Post-Grant Strategy Account for the Rise of Serial Challenges Flowing From the PTAB to the CRU?

After eight weeks of shifts in governmental policies, the patent bar is feeling repercussions from all directions. One critical area in flux is the post-grant challenge arena. With a reduced PTAB head count and a steady flow…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Sterne Kessler’s Reissue, Reexamination, and Supplemental Examination Practice Tips – March 2025

In the mid-2000s, the U.S. Patent Office (USPTO) determined that reexaminations would be more consistent and legally correct if performed by a centralized set of experienced and specially trained Examiners. As a result, the…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Is (Copyright) Paradise Lost for A Recent Entrance to Paradise and Other AI-Generated Works?

Last week, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Thaler v. Perlmutter. The opinion notably solidifies the U.S. Copyright Office’s position that works generated autonomously (and thus solely) by artificial…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Does Trademark Law Protect “Bad Will”?

On March 21, 2025, I participated in a spirited panel at the annual IP symposium hosted by the Penn Intellectual Property Group (PIPG) at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Titled “How Far Should Trademark…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property

Latest PTAB Memo Bifurcates Pre-Institution Briefing; Creates New Separate Briefing on Discretionary Considerations

On March 26, 2025, the USPTO issued the attached memo titled “Interim Processes for PTAB Workload Management,” which significantly alters the pre-institution briefing procedure for IPRs and PGRs. Under the Interim Process,…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

PTAB Issues Memo on Fintiv Analysis Changes

On March 24, 2025, Chief Administrative Patent Judge Scott R. Boalick issued a memo directed to the members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) explaining why the USPTO’s June 2022 Fintiv memo was rescinded and how the…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

PTAB Year in Review – PTAB Trends in 2024: Challenges to Genus Claims

In the biotechnology and chemical spaces, genus claims are often sought by patent applicants to protect not only a specific product of interest, but also as a means to protect against others making related products that…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Reexamination of Expired Patents

Takeaways - - Expired patents may be eligible for reexamination. - Owner’s options during reexamination of an expired patent are severely limited. Similar to reexamination practice, which has long allowed reexamination of…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Antedating Prior Art in Reissue and Reexamination: Part 1

Takeaways - - Pre-AIA patents may be able to “swear behind” prior art applied in reissue and reexamination. - “Swearing behind” has limits and obtaining sufficient evidence to establish prior invention may be difficult to…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

IP Hot Topic: Amended Rules at the ITC

The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) recently amended its Rules and Regulations, making a number of changes to its discovery and complaint-filing procedures. The new rules went into effect on February 3, 2025. The new…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade

PTAB Year in Review – Caveat Experimenter: Using Experimental Data in PTAB Proceedings Comes With Risks

Parties involved in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings sometimes contemplate submitting experimental data to support their positions. Although such data can be useful, there also are risks. Several recent cases…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology
Showing 1-15 of 1328 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 89
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide