News & Analysis as of

Abstract Ideas Post-Grant Review

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Patent Claims to a System for Drilling a Well Found Ineligible Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently found unpatentable claims that are directed to a processor-based system for drilling a well that selects a desired path for the wellbore based on factors such as curvature,...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Denies Review In Three Section 101 Cases

Troutman Pepper on

On January 13, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in the following cases...more

Jones Day

Privacy Management Patent Invalidated as Abstract in Post Grant Review

Jones Day on

On October 10, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued a Final Written Decision in favor of Avepoint, Inc. (“Avepoint”) and against Onetrust, LLC (“Onetrust”) in an America Invents Act post grant review...more

Troutman Pepper

Updated Guidance on Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility

Troutman Pepper on

On October 17, 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a 22-page updated guidance document on subject matter eligibility under 35 USC §101.  Subject matter eligibility is becoming increasingly important in the...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Bipartisan and Bicameral Draft Bill Aims to Reform U.S. Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Law

Recently, a bipartisan, bicameral draft bill was introduced as part of an ongoing effort to reform U.S. patent subject matter eligibility law. In this alert, we discuss relevant background leading up to the draft bill, the...more

Troutman Pepper

Recent Proposal for Section 101 Reform

Troutman Pepper on

A bipartisan group of Senators and Representatives recently released a framework for amending Section 101.  The group includes Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), as well as Representative Doug...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Post-Grant Review May Be Used to Invalidate Patents Directed to Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing patent-eligible subject matter issues, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) issued a final written decision in a post-grant review (PGR) finding all claims of a newly issued patent unpatentable under...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Netsirv v. Boxbee, Inc. (PTAB 2016)

A post grant review (PGR) is an administrative reconsideration of a recent-granted U.S. patent. The proceeding is held in the USPTO, before that body's Patent Trial and Appeal Board. A petition for PGR is timely if it is...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

The Specter of Alice Looms Large Even in PGRs

On August 3, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a post-grant review decision that bears one striking similarity to its previous post-grant review decisions, namely invalidation of claims under Alice Corp. Pty. v....more

McDermott Will & Emery

In First Set of Post-Grant Review Decisions, PTAB Strikes Down Patents Based on Alice

Addressing for the first time the issue of patent validity in the context of an America Invents Act post-grant review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) invalidated two livestock patents as unpatentable under...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Petitioner Wins Uncontested Alice Fight - Netsirv v. Boxbee, Inc.

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a decision to institute post-grant review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) clarified the importance of corroboration to establish the credibility of testimony relating to prior public use in a post grant...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide