News & Analysis as of

Abstract Ideas Precedential Opinion Patents

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - June 2024 #2

Beteiro, LLC v. Draftkings Inc., Appeal Nos. 2022-2275, -2277, -2278, -2279, -2281, 2283 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2024) In its only precedential patent opinion this week, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Rule 12(b)(6)...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch: District Court’s “Seemingly Siloed and Inflexible Approach” to Obviousness “Ran Afoul” of KSR

WilmerHale on

Precedential and Key Federal Circuit Opinions - 1.  JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [OPINION] (2022-1258, 2022-1307, 4/1/2024) (Dyk, Prost, and Hughes) - Prost, J. The Court affirmed...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Stick to the original idea in reissues

WilmerHale on

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions - IN RE: FLOAT'N'GRILL LLC [OPINION] (2022-1438, 7/12/2023) (Prost, Linn, and Cunningham) - Linn, J. The Court affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision “affirming the...more

Haug Partners LLP

Alice Put to the Test for Video Surveillance Systems

Haug Partners LLP on

On February 17, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Castle Retail, LLC that affirmed a district court’s decision to grant defendants’ Rule...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Patent claims found to lack patentable subject matter because they used “functional language, at a...

WilmerHale on

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions - NATURE SIMULATION SYSTEMS INC. v. AUTODESK, INC. [OPINION] (2020-2257, 10/17/2022) (Newman, Lourie, and Dyk) - Newman, J. The Court reversed a district court judgment that the...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week in the Federal Circuit (October 25-29): Taking the Pulse of Another § Decision

While there may have been no public tricks or treats from the Federal Circuit last week, the Court still managed to issue a range of precedential and non-precedential decisions. Below we provide our usual weekly statistics...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week in the Federal Circuit (October 4-8): An “Inventive” Authentication Scheme Takes The Cake Under Alice

Even though last week was argument week, that didn’t slow down the issuance of decisions at the Federal Circuit. Below we provide our usual weekly statistics and our case of the week—our highly subjective selection based on...more

WilmerHale

CAFC Patent Cases - September 2021

WilmerHale on

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions - *WilmerHale represented the Appellee. COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC. [OPINION] (2020-1817, 2020-1818, 08/24/2021) (REYNA, SCHALL, and STOLL) - Stoll, J....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week in the Federal Circuit (July 12-16): Under Alice, Another Patent Bites The Dust

Keniece Gray, Morrison & Foerster summer associate, co-authored this post.  We could have a new Federal Circuit judge today (achieving gender parity on the Court). Last week, the Senate invoked cloture (by a 63-34 vote) on...more

Sunstein LLP

Upgrade of Appeal Board Decisions Sought to Help Patent Medical Innovations

Sunstein LLP on

The Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has been asked to upgrade the status of two recent decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which determined that two medical innovations are eligible to be...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

An Informative PTAB Decision on Patent Eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101

The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) recently designated its decision in Ex Parte HANNUN (Appeal 2018-003323) (“HANNUN”) as being informative regarding the application of the latest 2019 revised guidance on...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Federal Circuit Closes Door on Patentability in Chamberlain

In The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Techtronic Industries Co., the Federal Circuit weighed in on the type of subject matter that can be characterized as an “abstract idea” and, thus, not eligible for patent protection....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Today’s Special: Validity Goulash - Serving Up 101 in the Mechanical Arts

A divided Federal Circuit, in a precedential opinion, upheld a lower court’s finding that the claims of US Patent No. 7,774,911 ineligible for patenting under Section 101 because the claims are directed to a law of nature....more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Fresh From the Bench: Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit

The Circuit affirms the decision in Secured Mail v. Universal to dismiss an infringement case under Rule 12(b)(6), holding that all of the asserted claims of the seven patents are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Guest Post -- USPTO Charting the Way for Subject Matter Eligibility

On November 2, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued an important and forward-looking memo on Recent Subject Matter Eligibility Decisions for patent applications that offered guidance for drafting...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide