News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Drainage

Womble Bond Dickinson

Navigating Property Nuisance Litigation: Lessons from Satcher v. Columbia County on Injunctive Relief and Damage Awards

Womble Bond Dickinson on

In litigation underlying Satcher v. Columbia County, 2024 WL 3802370 (Ga. Aug. 13, 2024), property owners sued the County related to damage caused by their privately-owned 48-inch pipe that had been used as part of the...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Surveyor/Stormwater Drainage/Adjacent Landowner: Indiana Appellate Court Addresses Trespass Claims

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

An Indiana appellate court addressed in a January 31st decision issues arising in a landowner’s civil and criminal trespass actions against a neighboring landowner. See Clark v. Thessalonica, Inc., 2023 WL 1156978. The...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Inverse Condemnation/Municipal Drainage Pipe Approval: Arkansas Court of Appeals Addresses Taking Claim

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

The Arkansas Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”) addressed in a February 15th Opinion issues arising out of an inverse condemnation claim. See City of Sherwood v. Clint Bearden, 2023 Ark. App. 67. The inverse...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Appellate Division finds Village Responsible for Maintenance of Bulkhead Related to Drainage Easement

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Plaintiffs own property in the Village of Freeport on Randall Bay and granted a drainage easement to the Village in 1961. The easement, dated September 6, 1961, allowed the Village to “construct and maintain one underground...more

Snell & Wilmer

Colorado Court of Appeals clarifies that a finding of irreparable harm is not required to enter a permanent injunction to enforce...

Snell & Wilmer on

On March 21, 2019, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Rinker v. Colina-Lee, holding for the first time that the “irreparable harm” element typically required to grant a permanent injunction is not needed for...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

With This Tie, There Is a Winner: 4-4 SCOTUS Ruling Results in Victory for Native Americans and a Clear Mandate for Washington to...

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

In most instances, a tie means there is no winner and no loser. Not so with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 4-4 tie in the “Culverts Case” (one branch of the sprawling U.S. v. Washington case) on June 11, 2018. Instead, by...more

Stoel Rives LLP

Supreme Court Affirms Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Culverts Case

Stoel Rives LLP on

Today the United States Supreme Court issued a 4-4 per curiam decision (Justice Kennedy was recused) affirming the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the Culverts case, which is the latest...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Court of Appeal Upholds Issuance of Erosion-Control Permit as Ministerial and Exempt from CEQA

Holland & Knight LLP on

In Sierra Club et al. v. County of Sonoma et al. (2017 WL 1422533), the California First District Court of Appeal held that the issuance of an erosion-control permit by the Agricultural Commissioner of Sonoma County...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide