News & Analysis as of

Arbitrary and Capricious Clean Air Act

Nossaman LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies Requirement for Agencies to Respond to Public Comments on Proposed Rulemakings

Nossaman LLP on

The week of June 23, 2024, in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified in a 5-4 decision that if a federal agency fails to provide a reasoned response to comments raised during the rulemaking...more

Snell & Wilmer

South Coast Air Quality Management District to Regulate Distribution Warehouses, Part 2

Snell & Wilmer on

The South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) is pursuing a new rule to regulate distribution warehouses. The SCAQMD’s focus is not on emissions generated by the warehouses or their equipment. Rather, its focus...more

Perkins Coie

Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Indirect Emitter Portions of the Clean Air Rule

Perkins Coie on

In a split decision issued on January 16, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Ecology (Ecology) lacks authority under the state’s Clean Air Act (the act) to cap greenhouse gas emissions from...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Exceptional Events/Clean Air Act: Federal Appellate Court Addresses Challenge to Approval of Colorado SIP

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (“10th Circuit”) addressed in a July 24th opinion a challenge to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)approval of a Colorado State Implementation Plan (“SIP”). See...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

California-led Coalition Files Suit to Prevent Rollback of Vehicle Emission Standards

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A coalition of states has opened a new front in the ongoing battles between the Trump Administration’s efforts to streamline regulations applicable to industry and the interests favoring additional regulation. In response to...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

CSAPR > BART: The Eighth Circuit Affirms Minnesota’s Regional Haze Plan

Environmental lawyers live for acronyms. Why is CSAPR > BART? Because EPA determined that, on net, EPA’s Transport Rule is “better than BART,” meaning that compliance with the Transport Rule yields greater progress towards...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

In Cooperative Federalism, Who Gets Deference, EPA or the States? Can you say “Federal Supremacy”?

Earlier this week, the 9th Circuit denied Arizona’s challenge to EPA’s decision to reject Arizona’s SIP addressing regional haze requirements and instead promulgate its own federal implementation plan. The decision has a...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide