News & Analysis as of

Arbitrary and Capricious Rulemaking Process Environmental Policies

Nossaman LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies Requirement for Agencies to Respond to Public Comments on Proposed Rulemakings

Nossaman LLP on

The week of June 23, 2024, in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified in a 5-4 decision that if a federal agency fails to provide a reasoned response to comments raised during the rulemaking...more

Perkins Coie

Washington Supreme Court Invalidates Indirect Emitter Portions of the Clean Air Rule

Perkins Coie on

In a split decision issued on January 16, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Ecology (Ecology) lacks authority under the state’s Clean Air Act (the act) to cap greenhouse gas emissions from...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Pollution Control Board’s Clean Construction or Demolition Debris Rules, and Articulates Guidelines...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Illinois Supreme Court recently affirmed that the Illinois Pollution Control Board’s clean construction or demolition debris (CCDD) rules were not arbitrary and capricious. County of Will v. Pollution...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide