News & Analysis as of

Article III Consumer Reporting Agencies Standing

Troutman Pepper

Missouri Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Challenge Compliance Condition Code on Consumer Report

Troutman Pepper on

A U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Missouri recently granted a defendant’s summary judgment motion in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case, holding that the plaintiff lacked standing because she did...more

Troutman Pepper

Fourth Circuit Finds No Article III Standing in Privacy Case

Troutman Pepper on

A new Fourth Circuit decision has thrown out of federal court a state-law privacy claim where the plaintiff alleged only a bare statutory violation without alleging “a nonspeculative, increased risk of identity theft,”...more

Troutman Pepper

New Jersey District Court Dismisses Claims Brought under the FCRA After Data Breach Incident

Troutman Pepper on

On December 22, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed putative class claims brought against a health insurance company, following a 2013 data breach incident. In In re Horizon Healthcare Servs. Data...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

FCRA Year in Review: Key FCRA Appellate Decisions

Hudson Cook, LLP on

[co-author: David Anthony] In 2020, the appellate courts had numerous opportunities to weigh in on many unanswered questions that remain in litigation after over 50 years since the statute was first enacted. The case law...more

Troutman Pepper

Claims Arising Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)(1)(A) — the Certification Requirement

Troutman Pepper on

In the years following the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016) — which held that “bare procedural violation[s], divorced from any concrete harm, [do not] satisfy the injury-in-fact...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U. S. Supreme Court to Consider Article III Standing for Absent Class Members in Review of Ninth Circuit Decision

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has again granted a petition to examine standing in the context of class actions, specifically whether Article III of the Constitution permits members of a certified class to recover money...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Ninth Circuit Rules That Users, Not Consumers, Must Prove an Authorized Purpose for Obtaining a Consumer Report

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Synopsis: Last month, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion, affirming broad Article III standing and holding that, for permissible-purpose claims, a consumer-plaintiff need allege only that his/her credit report was obtained...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property & Financial Services Update: Week Ending May 31, 2019

Carlton Fields on

Real Property Update - Public Official Standing Doctrine: county school district that benefited from ad valorem taxes charged by county could not challenge constitutionality of statutory tax exemption claimed by homeowners...more

Locke Lord LLP

Seventh Circuit Encourages Gamesmanship In Debt Disputes

Locke Lord LLP on

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has recently issued several decisions unfavorable to debt collectors, including McMahon v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 12 C 1410, 2018 WL 1316736 (N.D. Ill. Mar....more

Fenwick & West LLP

Litigation Alert: The Third Circuit Holds That Allegations That Personal Information Was Improperly Disclosed in Violation of the...

Fenwick & West LLP on

Last week, the Third Circuit held that allegations of the unauthorized disclosure of personal information in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) constituted a de facto injury sufficient to confer standing at the...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court Vacates Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robbins, Holds “Bare Procedural Violation” of FCRA Does Not...

Burr & Forman on

In a much-anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled on Monday in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 13-1339, 2016 WL 2842447 (May 16, 2016), that a consumer cannot bring a lawsuit in federal court based only on a...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

This morning the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 13-1339. As our loyal blog readers know, this is a case that corporate counsel need to follow closely in light of the stakes for the...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide