News & Analysis as of

Australia The Corporations Act Liquidation

White & Case LLP

Schemes of Arrangement in Australia

White & Case LLP on

A creditors' scheme of arrangement ("Scheme") can be a powerful restructuring tool implemented to achieve a variety of outcomes for a business, ranging from deleveraging or a debt-to-equity conversion to a merger and/or issue...more

K&L Gates LLP

Equitable Subrogation and "Controllers" for the Purposes of the Corporations Act 2001 - Can a Lawyer be a "Controller"?

K&L Gates LLP on

In Bolwell & Anor v NWC Finance Pty Ltd & Ors [2024] VSC 30, the Supreme Court of Victoria clarified that a lawyer will not be a "controller" of property within the meaning of section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the...more

K&L Gates LLP

Ding Dong – Set-Off is Gone: Absolutely Set-Off is Definitely No Longer Available as a Defence to an Unfair Preference Claim:...

K&L Gates LLP on

The High Court of Australia in Metal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton [2023] HCA 1 has confirmed the view of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia that the "set off" defence under section 553C of the Corporations...more

Jones Day

First in Line in Australia: Resolving Competing Priorities Regimes When Winding up Companies in a Partnership

Jones Day on

In Short - The Situation: When winding up a company, liquidators must distribute any surplus funds following the satisfaction of any secured debts. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) contains a regime which provides that...more

Jones Day

Stopping the Phoenix From Rising: Australian Court Provides First Guidance on Creditor-Defeating Dispositions

Jones Day on

Background - In February 2020, the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("Act") was amended to add a new class of voidable transactions for companies that are being would up known as "creditor-defeating dispositions". This change was...more

Jones Day

Back on Top: Australian Court Affirms the "Peak Indebtedness Rule" in Unfair Preference Claims

Jones Day on

The Situation: When determining and quantifying unfair preference claims in Australia, does the Corporations Act permit liquidators to value transactions forming part of a single "continuous business relationship" (such as a...more

Jones Day

To Appeal or Not to Appeal? Liquidators Could Face Personal Costs Orders

Jones Day on

The Situation: Should liquidators be personally liable for the costs of unsuccessful appeals, without an entitlement to reimbursement by the company or its creditors in relation to those costs? The Conclusion: The general...more

Jones Day

Double Trouble: Court Advises Liquidators to Reject $905 Million Proofs of Debt

Jones Day on

The Situation: A liquidator can reject a "double proof" for what is, in substance, the same debt as another accepted proof of debt. The Question: When are liquidators justified in rejecting what could arguably be a double...more

Jones Day

Federal Court of Australia Finds Liquidator's Breach of Duty Claim Against Directors of Holding Company Valid

Jones Day on

The Situation: The question in Termite Resources NL (in liq) v Meadows, in the matter of Termite Resources NL (in liq) (No 2) [2019] FCA 354 was whether, in circumstances where the strategic, managerial and major operational...more

K&L Gates LLP

Federal Court Grants Electronic Notice Application

K&L Gates LLP on

On 27 March 2019, the Federal Court of Australia delivered an important decision demonstrating the Court's willingness to assist liquidators to streamline the procedural aspects of liquidations using technology with the aim...more

K&L Gates LLP

Eye of the Phoenix

K&L Gates LLP on

What is illegal phoenix activity and why is it a problem? Recent studies have shown that illegal phoenix activity is rife. It has resulted in direct costs to businesses, employees and the Government of $2.85 billion to $5.13...more

Jones Day

Australian Court Directs Receivers to Pay Priority Creditors of Company in Liquidation

Jones Day on

The Federal Court of Australia rules that receivers appointed to a company in liquidation are entitled to pay employee entitlements and fees. In Kirman v RWE Robinson & Sons Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of RWE Robinson...more

Hogan Lovells

Court of Appeal overturns Hamersley Iron v. Forge Group Power – set off rights in liquidation restored

Hogan Lovells on

In July 2017, we wrote about the case of Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (receivers and managers appointed), in which the Western Australian Supreme Court held that rights of set off...more

Jones Day

(Mighty) River Runs Dry: Australian High Court Rules "Holding" DOCAs Are Valid

Jones Day on

The Situation: The statutory moratorium period for voluntary administrators to restructure an insolvent company often is too short to find a solution. Administrators frequently utilise "holding" deeds of company arrangement...more

K&L Gates LLP

Set-Off Under Section 553C - It Forges On

K&L Gates LLP on

On 21 September 2018, the Supreme Court of Western Australia Court of Appeal delivered the eagerly anticipated decision in Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers...more

Jones Day

Ask and You May Receive: Equitable Liens, Administrators and Court Directions in Australia

Jones Day on

The Background: The administrators of an Australian auction house and gallery business applied to the Federal Court of Australia for directions to recover in excess of $1 million in fees and costs incurred with respect to...more

K&L Gates LLP

Court of Appeal Finds the Missing Linc

K&L Gates LLP on

On 9 March 2018, in what was a highly anticipated judgment for many liquidators, the Queensland Court of Appeal reversed the controversial first instance Supreme Court decision in the matter of Linc Energy Pty Ltd (In...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide