News & Analysis as of

Business Litigation Commercial Litigation

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Save the Date:  An Evening with New York’s Commercial Division Justices on September 12, 2024

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As summer winds down, ComDiv practitioners no doubt will soon be gearing up for the upcoming fall and winter months. Time again to trade in your flip-flops for legal pads. The year-end push will soon be upon us....more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Everything You Need to Know About Texas’s Business Courts

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

The newly-adopted Texas Business Courts open in September 2024. These courts will bolster the Texas judicial system by adding an efficient court that specializes in large commercial business disputes. ...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Texas Business Court Could Make Litigation Faster, More Efficient

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

Texas’ new business court, which the state hopes will make complex litigation more efficient, opens in less than four months. And while there’s still uncertainty about how the court will operate, its structure and the Texas...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Commercial Division Reiterates That It’s Not a Rubber Stamp for CPLR 3215 Default Motions: Movant Must Set Forth Prima Facie...

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Commercial Division litigators are keenly aware of CPLR 3215’s proof requirements. We can recite in our sleep the need to submit (1) proof of service, (2) proof of default, (3) the amount due, and (4) facts constituting the...more

Butler Snow LLP

LLCS & Jurisdictional Allegations in the Fifth Circuit: It’s Membership, not Ownership

Butler Snow LLP on

By now, attorneys practicing in the Fifth Circuit should know that if a case is in federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, they must ensure that the record supports the diversity of citizenship requirement, lest...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Litigation Byte (May Edition)

McGlinchey Stafford on

The Litigation Byte is the new name and format for McGlinchey’s Commercial Law Bulletin. Our new format will reflect McGlinchey’s national coverage and our expanded footprint while still serving up the digestible, insightful...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Proposed Trial Rules Reboot (Commercial Division Rules 25-33): Stay Tuned

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Since the inception of the New York State Supreme Court Commercial Division Rules in 1993, the rules have been consistently amended and refined by judges with practitioners’ input to “improve the efficiency with which such...more

Smith Anderson

The Journey To Lawsuit Resolution in North Carolina Federal Courts

Smith Anderson on

Fourth Circuit decision highlights the wide discretion federal district courts have to manage their calendars. The timing of litigation in federal courts is case-specific and hard to predict, but data from North Carolina...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Litigants Beware: New York Courts Admonish Entanglement in Arbitration Proceedings

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Arbitration can be an effective alternative for parties seeking to avoid drawn-out and costly litigation. As a result, it has become common practice for parties to negotiate arbitration clauses into their agreements....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Court of Appeals Clarifies New York’s Approach to “Successor Jurisdiction”

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On April 18, 2024, the New York Court of Appeals (New York’s highest appellate court) issued a decision in Lelchook v. Société Générale de Banque au Liban SAL, --- N.E.3d ---, 2024 WL 1661460 (Apr. 18, 2024) in which it held...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Chief Administrative Judge’s 2023 Annual Report, the State of the Commercial Division, and Other ComDiv Goings-On

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Every year around this time, New York’s Chief Administrative Judge publishes an annual report, which “collect[s], compile[s] and publish[es] statistics and other data with respect to the unified court system and submit[s]...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Affirmation in Lieu of an Affidavit, Now “with the Same Force and Effect”

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As of January 1, 2024, the amended CPLR 2106 concerning affirmations provides that - [t]he statement of any person wherever made, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Don’t Forget the Details: How Conclusory Pleadings Can Thwart Nonparty Disclosure

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Nonparty subpoenas are a useful discovery tool in commercial disputes. Particularly when the dispute involves access to or control over funds on deposit with a financial institution, the institution’s account statements, and...more

Dechert LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery’s Rescission of Elon Musk’s US$55.8 Billion Pay Package Signals Expansion of Scrutiny into Potential...

Dechert LLP on

The Delaware Court of Chancery issued a post-trial opinion, on January 30, 2024, in Tornetta v. Musk, holding that Tesla’s board of directors (the “Board”) breached its fiduciary duties in awarding CEO Elon Musk (with the...more

Troutman Pepper

Summary Judgment Ruling in Complex Contract Dispute Addresses Issues from A (Admiralty) to W (Warranty) and Many in Between

Troutman Pepper on

In a case involving a fact pattern that could be on a law school exam, EDVA Judge Mark Davis provides a detailed analysis of a series of issues in a complex dispute between a yacht owner and a marine engine manufacturer. What...more

Mayer Brown

Unravelling the Legal Landscape: Key Highlights of Company Litigation Developments in Hong Kong in 2023

Mayer Brown on

Here we present a concise summary of significant cases and developments in company litigation in Hong Kong in 2023. Highlights include: 1. Subject company's participation in unfair prejudice proceedings: The Court once...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

The Delaware Court of Chancery Confirms that Duty of Oversight Claims Against Corporate Officers Are Subject to the Same High...

In Segway Inc. v. Hong Cai, 2023 Del. Ch. LEXIS 643 (Del. Ch. Dec. 14, 2023), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Will, V.C.) dismissed a claim for breach of fiduciary duty brought by Segway Inc. (the “Company”) against its...more

Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Dann, LLP

Aiyo! Ruminations on Two Disputes that Weren’t

The two incidents I relate here may seem improbable coming from an attorney whose livelihood is in civil litigation, but they are both true. At least, one is. I know because it happened in front of me. The other was told to...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Evidence Behind E-SIGS

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The COVID-19 pandemic has unsurprisingly resulted in many people in the business community, including lawyers, transacting business remotely. With that uptick comes more contracts utilizing electronic signatures and remote...more

Miller & Martin PLLC

Batten the Hatches: Preparing for an Automotive Dispute

Miller & Martin PLLC on

Just as death and taxes are certainties in life, so too is litigation for many automotive companies. And while each case varies widely in terms of facts, law, parties, and forum, there are common points to consider in most...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

If the Service Was Poor, You’ll Have to Do More – How Much Diligence Is Due for Affix and Mail Service?

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over a defendant rests with the plaintiff. Service of process is a necessary component of jurisdiction, and it is not complete until proof of service is filed. Ordinarily,...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

I Filed An Appeal. Is There A Stay? (And What Does That Mean?)

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

One of the first questions I receive when chatting with a prospective client or a new client is: “Well, what happens after we file an appeal? Do I have to do what the judgment says I need to do?” My answer, of course, depends...more

DRI

Noneconomic Damages - Anchoring a Verdict Without Angering the Court

DRI on

The practice of anchoring in litigation is a well-known, much discussed practice among plaintiff-and defense-oriented attorneys and legal organizations. In, Gregory v. Chohan, 2023 Tex. LEXIS 528 (Tx. Jan. 31, 2023), the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe: Commercial Division Protects Corporate Client Communications Under the Common-Interest Doctrine

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The attorney-client privilege is an old and well-known evidentiary privilege. It fosters candor between attorney and client, protects confidential information from being revealed to others, and ensures that the attorney can...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Ready or Not, Here I Come: The Expansion of Substitute Service by Email

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The old game of “hide-and-seek” brings many of us back to our childhood as one of our favorite ways to pass time during the summer. As commercial practitioners know, the concept of serving a summons and complaint in a case...more

45 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide