News & Analysis as of

Business Litigation Unjust Enrichment

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Commercial Division Reiterates That It’s Not a Rubber Stamp for CPLR 3215 Default Motions: Movant Must Set Forth Prima Facie...

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Commercial Division litigators are keenly aware of CPLR 3215’s proof requirements. We can recite in our sleep the need to submit (1) proof of service, (2) proof of default, (3) the amount due, and (4) facts constituting the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Flexible “For Cause” Standard for Director and Officer Removal

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Sections 706 (d) and 716 (c) of the Business Corporation Law (the “BCL”) both contain a “for cause” standard for judicial removal of corporate directors and officers. Complaints with claims for judicial corporate director and...more

Gray Reed

A Breach of Fiduciary Duty in the Oil Patch

Gray Reed on

Antero Resources Corp. v. C & R Downhole Drilling, Inc. et al, proves again the extreme risk when one bites the hand that feeds him (shoutout to Greek poet Sappho, 600 BCE). Antero sued former employee Kawsak and his...more

Morris James LLP

Superior Court CCLD Declines to Award Costs for Special Master and Mediator, and Awards only Simple Interest on Judgment in...

Morris James LLP on

LCT Capital, LLC v. NGL Energy Partners LP, C.A. No. N15C-08-109 JJC CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. June 20, 2023) - Under Superior Court Rule 54, costs are allowed as a matter of course to the prevailing party. In this post-trial...more

Sands Anderson PC

Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit – Not the Same Thing

Sands Anderson PC on

On a great many occasions, I’ve seen the two causes of action in the title, Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit, spoken in the same breath, as if they are either one in the same or so closely related that they are...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Conflicts of Laws and the Internal Affairs Doctrine

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The legal concept of “conflicts of laws” is difficult, to say the least, confounding even seasoned litigators and judges, with bulky treatises and entire law school classes devoted to the subject....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

All You Need Is Love… And An Articulable Nexus Of Fraud

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

What can you do when the parties you are suing are effectively judgment-proof? Oftentimes, plaintiffs will try to go after a defendant’s family member or related entity. ...more

Gray Reed

Caution: Court Finds Fiduciary Waivers Ineffective

Gray Reed on

In In re Cadira Group Holdings, LLC (2021 WL 2912479 (Del. Ch. July 12, 2021)), the Delaware Court of Chancery has again shown its inclination to treat an agreement that purports to replace traditional fiduciary duties with...more

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

Qualcomm Escapes Diversity Suit

Another diversity-based derivative suit was dismissed this week by a federal district court, joining a list of decisions that have rejected similar shareholder allegations. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Disguised Agreements and Dissolution

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Appearances can be deceiving. - That, essentially, was the argument made in two recently decided cases involving claims for judicial dissolution. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Joint Venture Agreements: For Better or For Worse; In Profit or In Loss

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Just like a bride and groom vow to join together for better or for worse, commercial parties joining together through a joint venture must make a similar promise to share in profits and losses. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Oral Partnership Operating as a Corporation: Is it a Partnership? A Corporation? Can it be Both?

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Oral agreements to form and operate business enterprises are a recurring subject of this blog. We’ve written many times, for example, about the comparative ease vis-a-vis other kinds of entities with which one can...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Re-Revisiting The Duty to Disclose Third-Party Offers Amidst Buy-Out Negotiations

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Another Door Closes to Federal Court in Judicial Dissolution Cases

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Not for the first time, I find myself intrigued by the federal courts’ resistance to hearing state law claims for judicial dissolution of business entities where subject matter jurisdiction otherwise exists based on diversity...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

When are damages based on unjust enrichment appropriate?

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Ohio courts have long been in agreement that “[i]t is clearly the law in Ohio that an equitable action in quasi-contract for unjust enrichment will not lie when the subject matter of that claim is covered by an express...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Kanye West and EMI Agree in Principle to Settle Legal Quarrel

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Kanye West and music publisher EMI have agreed on something (at least in theory) – to settle their legal battle. According to a court document filed on September 23, the parties reached an “agreement in principle” to settle...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Summer Day Camp Derivative Headed to Trial

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

A recent decision in Greenhaus v. Gersh out of the Commercial Division, Suffolk County, is yet another example.  This time, the business is a summer day camp located on the north shore of Long Island in Huntington, New York....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Shareholder Oppression Requires More Than Denial of Access to Company Information

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The family-owned business at the center of Vaccari v Vaccari, 2018 NY Slip Op 30546(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 28, 2018], decided last month by veteran Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten, is a classic...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Blue Man Group Member’s Fiduciary Duty Claim Drummed Out of Court

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Ian Pai was an early participant in the Blue Man Group (“BMG”). Between 1989 and 1991, he met and began collaborating with the founders of BMG, namely, Chris Wink, Phillip Stanton and Matt Goldman. ...more

Carlton Fields

In Battle Of Apparel Companies, Court Compels Arbitration

Carlton Fields on

In early September, a New York district court granted defendants United States Polo Association, Inc. (“USPA”) and Arvind Ltd.’s (“Arvind”) motion to compel arbitration. It further dismissed Ralph Lauren Corporation and its...more

20 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide