News & Analysis as of

Buyers Supply Chain Supply Contracts

Warner Norcross + Judd

Trial Courts Begin to Address Major Supply Chain Contracting Questions with Differing Outcomes

Warner Norcross + Judd on

Following the Michigan Supreme Court’s landmark decision in MSSC, Inc. v. AirBoss Flexible Products Co., 511 Mich. 176 (2023), in which Warner represented the prevailing party, many businesses have been re-examining whether...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

Supply Chain Survival Series: Acceptance, Rejection, Revocation of Acceptance, and Right to Cure (Article #11)

Quarles & Brady LLP on

In our previous articles in the Supply Chain Survival Series, we discussed when a party’s failure to perform may (or may not) be excused by a contractual force majeure provision or by the common law doctrines of...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supply Contract Update: Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms that a Requirements Contract Need Not Be Exclusive (Cadillac Rubber &...

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On February 11, 2020, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a significant decision that impacts manufacturing supply contracts – especially those in the automotive industry – holding that a buyer may enforce a supply contract...more

Benesch

INCOTERMS – Ground Zero for Negotiating Tariff Impact

Benesch on

The INCOTERMS published by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) have long served the international community by offering a “shorthand” for communicating key shipping terms. INCOTERMS are so ubiquitous in international...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide