News & Analysis as of

CA Supreme Court Employer Liability Issues Employment Policies

Weintraub Tobin

California Employment News: Can Pre- and Post-Shift Activities Be Compensated (Podcast)

Weintraub Tobin on

Meagan Bainbridge and Lukas Clary from Weintraub Tobin's Labor and Employment Group dive into the California Supreme Court case Huerta vs. CSI Electrical Contractors. Discover the key takeaways for employers on compensable...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

California Supreme Court Confirms the “Knowing and Intentional” Standard of California’s Wage Statement Law Requires a “Knowing...

In Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, the case’s second appearance before the California Supreme Court in two years, the Supreme Court confirmed that an employer does not incur civil penalties for failing to report unpaid...more

Venable LLP

California Supreme Court Clarifies What Qualifies as Hours Worked

Venable LLP on

Is an employee compensable for time spent on waiting and exit searches as "hours worked," even after clocking out? Per the California Supreme Court, it depends on the level of the employer's control over its employees....more

McGuireWoods LLP

California Supreme Court: Exit Security Checks in Personal Vehicles Are Compensable

McGuireWoods LLP on

On March 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court held that workers are entitled to compensation for time spent undergoing exit security checks that included an inspection of their personal vehicle. In the same decision, the...more

BakerHostetler

California Supreme Court Holds that Employees Must Be Paid for Time Driving Through and To Security Checkpoints

BakerHostetler on

California employers who require employees to pass through a security checkpoint or swipe a security badge before exiting their worksites but after clocking out could potentially face significant liability for violating...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Supremes Set Bounds on Employer Duty to Non-Workers

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court unanimously held that while claims brought by an employee’s spouse for COVID injury are not barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act’s (WCA) exclusivity provision, policy...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Case Summaries: April 2023

Payne & Fears on

A plaintiff maintains standing to pursue a non-individual PAGA claim in state court when his individual PAGA claim is sent to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Security Checks Gain Renewed Attention

CDF Labor Law LLP on

The California Supreme Court will soon decide if employees must be compensated for time spent waiting in their cars to pass through an employer’s security check. Specifically, the California Supreme Court will decide...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Meal, Rest Break Violations Trigger Additional Penalties in California

Employers that fail to provide premium pay for missed meal and rest periods in California face additional monetary penalties under the state’s Labor Code, according to a unanimous decision from the California Supreme Court. ...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

California Supreme Court: Unpaid Meal and Rest Period Premiums Can Lead to Wage Statement and Waiting Time Penalties

On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court ruled in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. that unpaid meal and rest period premiums can form the basis of claims for wage statement violations under California Labor...more

Jones Day

California Supreme Court Authorizes Additional Remedies for Meal Break Violations: Waiting Time and Wage Statement Penalties Now...

Jones Day on

The California Supreme Court sides with employees in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, finding derivative claims available for waiting time and pay stub penalties available for meal and rest break violations. This...more

Polsinelli

California Employers Must Know: Meal/Rest Premiums Are ‘Wages’

Polsinelli on

California reaffirms its reputation as the most employee-friendly state and raises potential liability for employers. On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court issued the long-awaited decision in Naranjo v. Spectrum...more

Troutman Pepper

California Supreme Court Substantially Increases Stakes for Noncompliant Meal and Rest Breaks

Troutman Pepper on

On May 23, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., holding that the one-hour premium for missed meal and rest breaks constitutes wages that expose employers to...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Wage Statement And Final Pay Rules Apply To Meal And Rest Break Premiums

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court recently determined that meal and rest period premium payments are subject to the final pay timing requirements of Labor Code section 203 and the wage statement reporting...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Supreme Court Finds Meal And Rest Premiums Subject To Wage Statement And Final Pay Requirements

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court recently determined that meal and rest period premium payments are subject to the final pay timing requirements of Labor Code section 203 and the wage statement reporting...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

CA Supreme Court Holds Meal and Rest Break Premiums are “WAGES”

On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., 40 Cal. App. 5th 444 (2019). The Court reversed in part the decision of the Court of Appeal by...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Meal Premiums Now Considered A “Wage” By California Supreme Court In Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Earlier this week, the California Supreme Court added another layer of complexity to California’s already-onerous wage and hour regulatory scheme. In this week’s development, the California Supreme Court held in Naranjo v....more

Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth

Important CA Supreme Court Decision Regarding Meal and Rest Periods – Be Sure to Read This

On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court held that the one hour of premium pay owed to an employee when they are not provided with a compliant meal or rest break constitutes “wages.” This ruling in Naranjo v. Spectrum...more

Lewitt Hackman

No break from penalties – CA Supreme Court holds unpaid premiums give rise to waiting time penalties

Lewitt Hackman on

The California Supreme Court published its decision in Gustavo Naranjo et al., v. Spectrum Security Services holding that employers who fail to pay for meal or rest break premiums, may also be responsible for waiting time and...more

Stoel Rives - World of Employment

California Supreme Court Extends Employees’ Rights to Waiting-Time Penalties and Other Damages

On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services and decided two critical questions: first, whether an employee is entitled to “waiting time...more

Fisher Phillips

July 2021: The Top 14 Labor And Employment Law Stories

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there have been an unprecedented number of changes for the past few years—and this past month...more

Cooley LLP

Alert: California Supreme Court Concludes Calculation of Meal and Rest Period Premiums Based on ‘Regular Rate’

Cooley LLP on

Under California law, nonexempt employees are entitled to certain meal and rest periods during the workday. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 226.7, an employer who fails to provide meal or rest periods must provide...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Premium Payments Calculated Like Overtime, California Supreme Court Says—and Retroactively

California employers must include nondiscretionary payments made to employees when making premium payments for missing meal or rest periods, the state’s highest court has ruled in a decision with retroactive application....more

Troutman Pepper

California Supreme Court Sets Retroactive Standard for Calculating Meal and Rest Break Premiums

Troutman Pepper on

On July 15, 2021, the California Supreme Court in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC clarified that the “regular rate of compensation” for meal and rest break premiums is synonymous with the “regular rate of pay” used to...more

Stokes Wagner

California Supreme Court Holds that “Regular Rate of Compensation” Is Synonymous with “Regular Rate of Pay” for Purposes of...

Stokes Wagner on

On July 15, 2021, The Supreme Court of California published its opinion on Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC and reversed the appellate court’s decision. Under California law, employers must provide employees with...more

77 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide