News & Analysis as of

CA Supreme Court Security Checks

Venable LLP

California Supreme Court Clarifies What Qualifies as Hours Worked

Venable LLP on

Is an employee compensable for time spent on waiting and exit searches as "hours worked," even after clocking out? Per the California Supreme Court, it depends on the level of the employer's control over its employees....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Another Security Check Point Case: Compensable Or Not?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

There have been a number of cases, in different jurisdictions, involving whether time spent undergoing security checks is compensable time. One issue involved is whether the activity is for the benefit of the employer and if...more

Weintraub Tobin

The California Supreme Court Further Clarifies the Definition of “Hours Worked”

Weintraub Tobin on

At the request of the 9th Circuit, the California Supreme Court recently clarified the definition of “hours worked” under the Labor Code. In Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors, the employees worked at a solar power...more

McGuireWoods LLP

California Supreme Court: Exit Security Checks in Personal Vehicles Are Compensable

McGuireWoods LLP on

On March 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court held that workers are entitled to compensation for time spent undergoing exit security checks that included an inspection of their personal vehicle. In the same decision, the...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

California Supreme Court Issues Opinion on “Hours Worked”

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In its recent opinion in Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors, the California Supreme Court addressed three inquiries posed by the 9th Circuit. These inquiries specifically relate to the definition of “hours worked” within...more

BakerHostetler

California Supreme Court Holds that Employees Must Be Paid for Time Driving Through and To Security Checkpoints

BakerHostetler on

California employers who require employees to pass through a security checkpoint or swipe a security badge before exiting their worksites but after clocking out could potentially face significant liability for violating...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Supreme Court Attempts To Clarify Issues Of Control

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On March 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court unanimously answered three questions regarding the meaning of "hours worked” that had been certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. This ruling illuminates what...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

California Supreme Court Examines Compensable Time Based On Security Checks

CDF Labor Law LLP on

On Monday, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors Inc., answering three questions about the scope of the term “hours worked” in Wage Order No. 16. While Wage Order No.16...more

Paul Hastings LLP

California Supreme Court Clarifies Whether Employers Must Pay for Certain Pre-Shift Activities

Paul Hastings LLP on

In Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors, No. S275431 (March 25, 2024), the California Supreme Court issued an important decision relating to whether California employers must pay non-exempt employees for certain pre-shift...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Holiday Gift for Oregon Employers: Security Screenings Are Not Compensable Absent Contract, Custom, or Practice

On December 15, 2022, the Oregon Supreme Court gave employers important clarity regarding compensable work time in Buero v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. The plaintiff in Buero, a warehouse employee, claimed that Amazon had...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Is Waiting In Your Car Compensable Working Time? California Supreme Court Will Decide

Fox Rothschild LLP on

I have blogged many times on security check cases and whether that waiting time is compensable. It continues to be a thorny issue and pops up in many jurisdictions. In an interesting variation on this theme, the California...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Security Checks Gain Renewed Attention

CDF Labor Law LLP on

The California Supreme Court will soon decide if employees must be compensated for time spent waiting in their cars to pass through an employer’s security check. Specifically, the California Supreme Court will decide...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Time Spent By Employees In Exit Searches Is Compensable

Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., 2020 WL 5225699 (9th Cir. 2020) - Earlier this year, the California Supreme Court answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit: “Is time spent on the employer’s premises waiting for,...more

Fisher Phillips

Employees Win Latest California Bag Check Case – But Court Leaves One Final Cliffhanger On The Compensability Of Closing Tasks

Fisher Phillips on

The long-fought bag-check battle against Apple is coming to an end, and the employee class just won a major victory in California when a federal court of appeals ruled that the company must pay its workers for the time spent...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Time Spent By Employees In Exit Searches Is Compensable

Frlekin v. Apple Inc., 2020 WL 727813 (Cal. S. Ct. 2020) - In this opinion, the California Supreme Court answered a question certified to it by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: “Is time spent on...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: February 2020

Payne & Fears on

Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., -- Cal. -- (2020) - Summary:  The time employees spent on Apple’s premises waiting for and undergoing a mandatory exit search of personal belongings was compensable as “hours worked” under Wage...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Yes, Waiting In Line To Exit Through Security Is Hours Worked

Fox Rothschild LLP on

A recent ruling confirmed that the time an employee spends waiting in line for a security check is considered “hours worked” in California and must be paid. The California Supreme Court ruling applies even though the...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Employees Must Be Paid for Time Spent During Security Checks

Employers must pay their California employees for time spent on the employer’s premises waiting for and undergoing required exit searches of employee’s bags, packages, and other personal items, even if these items were...more

Perkins Coie

California Supreme Court Requires Employers to Pay for Mandatory Exit Searches

Perkins Coie on

The California Supreme Court recently issued a decision holding that the time spent on an employer’s premises waiting for and undergoing required exit searches is compensable time that must be paid to employees. The decision...more

Downey Brand LLP

California Supreme Court Holds Apple Employees Must Be Compensated for Time Spent Undergoing Exit Searches

Downey Brand LLP on

Last week, in Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that employee exit searches constituted compensable “hours worked” under California law. Under its “Employee Package and Bag Searches” policy, Apple...more

Stokes Wagner

California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Compensation During Mandatory Employee Exit Searches

Stokes Wagner on

On February 13, 2020, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., holding that the time employees spend waiting for their bags and other personal belongings to be screened at the end of a...more

Stoel Rives - World of Employment

California Supreme Court Clarifies What Constitutes “Hours Worked” Under California Law

In Amanda Frlekin v. Apple Inc., No. S243805 (Feb. 13, 2020), the California Supreme Court responded to a request by the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit to answer the following question...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

California Employers: Required Security Screening May Be Compensable Work Time

Employees must be paid for time spent waiting for, and undergoing, searches of their bags, packages and personal technology devices, the California Supreme Court ruled February 13, 2020, in Amanda Frlekin, et al. v Apple,...more

Payne & Fears

California Supreme Court Holds That Time Spent Undergoing Exit Searches Constitutes Compensable "Hours Worked"

Payne & Fears on

On February 13, 2020, in a unanimous opinion, the California Supreme Court held in Frlekin v. Apple Inc., Case No. S243805, that time spent on an employer's premises waiting for, and undergoing, required exit searches of...more

Epstein Becker & Green

California Supreme Court Holds That Time Spent Waiting by Apple Retail Employees for Exit Searches is Compensable under California...

Epstein Becker & Green on

It is not unusual for businesses at risk of employee theft to implement security screenings for employees as they exit the employer’s facilities.  Such screenings are especially common in industries where small, costly items...more

33 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide