News & Analysis as of

Chapter 11 Mass Tort Litigation Supreme Court of the United States

Fox Rothschild LLP

The Impact of Purdue Pharma

Fox Rothschild LLP on

It has been approximately two months since the highly anticipated Supreme Court decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., and it is already making a significant impact in bankruptcies around the country. In September...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court: No Nonconsensual Nondebtor Releases in Bankruptcy

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al., the U.S. Supreme Court held that nonconsensual releases of third-party claims against nondebtors are not authorized under the Bankruptcy Code, resolving a longstanding circuit...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Denies Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Purdue

On June 27, 2024, in one of its most high-profile bankruptcy decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., No. 23-124, holding that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code does not authorize releases...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The Purdue Decision on Third Party Releases and Its Practical Implications

Paul Hastings LLP on

In a landmark decision that will significantly impact future reorganization plans, the Supreme Court categorically held in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., that bankruptcy courts lack the authority to approve nonconsensual...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Purdue Pharma: Supreme Court Prohibits Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases; Ruling Will Reshape Bankruptcy Practice

In a landmark 5-4 decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma that will significantly reshape corporate bankruptcy practice, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding the authority of a bankruptcy court to approve...more

White and Williams LLP

SCOTUS Curtails Third-Party Releases, Prospectively Derails Mass Tort Chapter 11 Plans

White and Williams LLP on

In perhaps the most significant Supreme Court bankruptcy ruling since Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court today—by a 5-4 majority—overruled the Second Circuit’s approval of the Purdue Pharma Chapter 11 plan and its...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Who’s a Party in Interest? The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. Opens the Door for...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc. and Hanson Permanente Cement, Inc. (collectively, the “Debtors”), manufacturers of asbestos-containing cement products, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 30, 2016 (“Petition Date”) in the...more

Kerr Russell

U.S. Supreme Court to Address Permissibility of Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plans

Kerr Russell on

As the calendar turns to autumn, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) is commencing its new term and preparing to address a monumental issue that will impact chapter 11 law and the mass tort system: the permissibility...more

White and Williams LLP

District Court Overturns Purdue Pharma’s Chapter 11 Plan and Related Releases of Sackler Family from Opioid Liability Claims

On December 16, 2021, Judge McMahon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (District Court) issued her decision in In re: Purdue Pharma LP, overturning the bankruptcy judge’s confirmation of...more

White and Williams LLP

District Court Overturns Purdue Pharma’s Chapter 11 Plan and Related Releases of Sackler Family from Opioid Liability Claims

White and Williams LLP on

On December 16, 2021, Judge McMahon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (District Court) issued her decision in In re: Purdue Pharma LP, overturning the bankruptcy judge’s confirmation of...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide