News & Analysis as of

China Arbitration CIETAC

Carlton Fields

Second Circuit Affirms District Court Order Confirming Chinese Arbitration Award

Carlton Fields on

In Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court order granting summary judgment confirming a Chinese arbitration award totaling...more

Carlton Fields

Court Enforces Nine-Figure Chinese Arbitration Award, Finding Notice Requirements of New York Convention Were Satisfied

Carlton Fields on

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently denied a motion to reconsider its prior confirmation of a “multihundred-million-dollar” arbitration award by a Chinese arbitration panel. In the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Arbitration Updates From China, Stockholm and the World Bank

In this continuation of updates on international arbitration trends in 2022, several additional arbitral institutions have published their annual reports, confirming a busy recovery year in the international arbitration...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Commercial Division Permanently Stays International Arbitration

Earlier this year, in In re New York State Dept. of Health (Rusi Tech. Co., Ltd.), Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard Platkin issued a decision to permanently stay the arbitration before the China International...more

Carlton Fields

Chinese Arbitration Award Confirmed Despite US Company’s Claim of Unfair Treatment Stemming From US-China Trade War

Carlton Fields on

The Northern District of New York confirmed this month an arbitration award made in June 2018 by the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) in favor of two Chinese companies and against a U.S....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

PRC Companies in International Arbitration (Series 2): Interim Measures Arrangement between Mainland and HKSAR and its Practical...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On April 2, 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC and the Department of Justice of Hong Kong signed the “Arrangements concerning the Mutual Assistance in Court-Order Interim Measures in Aid of Arbitral Proceedings by...more

Jones Day

Second Circuit Holds Section 1782 Discovery Off Limits In Private International Arbitrations - Parties need to consider if the...

Jones Day on

Interpreting a key statutory provision for cross-border discovery, on July 8, 2020, the Second Circuit held that parties to a private international arbitration cannot obtain discovery in the United States in aid of that...more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

Another Federal Court (in the Ninth Circuit) Holds That 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Applies With Respect To Foreign Private Arbitrations

A federal court in the Northern District of California has adopted the reasoning and conclusion of a recent Sixth Circuit decision in holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1782 applies with respect to private foreign/international...more

Jones Day

SIAC Signs Memorandum of Understanding with CIETAC

Jones Day on

On October 12, 2018, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ("SIAC") signed a memorandum of understanding ("MOU") in Beijing with the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission ("CIETAC")....more

Hogan Lovells

Hong Kong court appoints receivers to preserve assets in aid of arbitral proceedings in China

Hogan Lovells on

The Hong Kong High Court has appointed receivers over shares in a Hong Kong company as an interim measure to preserve the status quo and the value of the shares, pending the outcome of CIETAC arbitration proceedings in...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Guangdong DOJ Wades Into the Fray by Demanding That CIETAC Cease “Illegal Arbitration Activities” in Guangdong

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On July 15, 2015, the PRC Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued an interpretation clarifying various jurisdictional issues arising from the mid-2012 decision of the former South China and Shanghai Sub-Commissions of the China...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

SPC Issues Interpretation on Jurisdictional Issues Arising from CIETAC Split

In a welcome development, the PRC Supreme People’s Court (the “SPC”) issued on July 15, 2015 an interpretation addressing various jurisdictional issues arising from the decision in mid-2012 of the former CIETAC Shanghai and...more

Zelle  LLP

A Primer on Insurance Dispute Resolution in China

Zelle LLP on

We previously discussed in a June 10, 2015, guest article the basics of insurance underwriting and claim handling in China. In this article, we give an overview of the legal framework and relevant key issues in insurance...more

Carlton Fields

Chinese Arbitration Award Affirmed In Mineral Company Dispute

Carlton Fields on

The court ruled that ACC Resources is bound by an arbitral award issued by the China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (“CIETAC”). The award required the mineral company to pay its supplier, Calbex Mineral...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

China Arbitration Update: New CIETAC Rules Effective January 1, 2015

The China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) approved a new set of arbitration rules effective on January 1, 2015. The 2015 CIETAC Rules include a number of important updates and revisions that...more

Dechert LLP

A Digest of the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Arbitration Rules: A More Liberal Development of Arbitration Practice in...

Dechert LLP on

After splitting from the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (the CIETAC) through the notable “CIETAC split” event in 2012, the Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (the...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide