News & Analysis as of

Claim Limitations Enablement Inquiries

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Brave New World: UPC Central Division’s First Opinion is a Revocation of Antibody Claims as Lacking Inventive Step

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s invalidation of a counterpart U.S. patent in the same family for lack of enablement (21-757 Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (05/18/23) (supremecourt.gov)), the UPC has now rendered a decision on its...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2023)

The Supreme Court's (re)consideration of the enablement requirement expected in its decision later this year in Amgen v. Sanofi may be the most closely watched patent case since AMP v. Myriad Genetics.  But in a decision...more

Haug Partners LLP

Has the Federal Circuit Just Put the Final Nail in the Coffin of Broad Functional Genus Claims?

Haug Partners LLP on

July 1, 2021 In a development having significant ramifications for many biopharma companies, the Federal Circuit has denied Amgen’s petition for rehearing en banc a decision invalidating a genus patent covering its antibody...more

Haug Partners LLP

Can Biopharma Functional Genus Patent Claims Be Resuscitated?

Haug Partners LLP on

An en banc rehearing petition to the Federal Circuit seeks to breathe life back into the widespread practice of patenting a genus of compounds by claiming their common functional characteristics. This claiming practice was...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

A Heightened Bar: Federal Circuit Leaves Functional Antibody Claims on Thin Ice

In a precedential opinion in Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLC, et al., No. 20-1074 (Fed. Cir. 2021) issued on February 11, 2021, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (Fed. Cir. 2021)

A little less than four years ago, the Federal Circuit rendered a decision in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi that brought clarity to how the Court (and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) should apply the written description requirement...more

Knobbe Martens

Large Quantity of Routine Experimentation Can Be “Undue Experimentation”

Knobbe Martens on

IDENIX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC v. GILEAD SCIENCES INC. Before Prost, Newman, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Synthesizing and screening tens of thousands of...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Incomplete Hybridization: Lack of Enablement Found Where Claims Encompass Thousands of Possibilities

McDermott Will & Emery on

Finding that the number of possible embodiments that could fit within the limitations of the asserted claims numbered in the “tens of thousands,” the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the claims were not...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide