News & Analysis as of

Contract Disputes › Coinbase › User Agreements

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

Beware Of Conflicting Terms: When Customers Entered Into Multiple Contracts, Scotus Says Courts Must Decide Which One Governs...

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on

On May 23, 2024, the United States Supreme Court decided Coinbase, Inc., v. Suski, No. 23-3, serving a reminder to companies with mandatory consumer-facing arbitration provisions that contractual consistency is a key to...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Supreme Court Says When It Comes to Deciding Arbitration Clauses: “I am the Law”

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP on

On May 23, the Supreme Court issued a decision holding that when parties have two conflicting contracts – one that sends disputes to arbitration and one that sends disputes to the courts – a court, not an arbitrator, must...more

Troutman Pepper

Cryptocurrency, Sweepstakes, and the Supreme Court: A Tale of Two Contracts

Troutman Pepper on

On May 23, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski et al., unanimously affirming the Ninth Circuit’s decision holding that when parties have agreed to two contracts — one sending arbitrability...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide