News & Analysis as of

Damages Diversity Jurisdiction

Smith Gambrell Russell

Diversity Jurisdiction, the Amount in Controversy, and Removal: A Defendant’s Burden

Smith Gambrell Russell on

In a lawsuit between parties located in different states, a plaintiff sometimes try to keep the case in the state court by being cagey about defining their damages to prevent the defendant from removing the case to federal...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

To Remand or Not to Remand, That Is the Question

​​​​​​​Generally, a case is not removable to federal court “more than one year after commencement of [an] action.” However, a defendant may remove a case to federal court after the one-year deadline if it can demonstrate the...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Product Liability 2019 Year in Review

Massachusetts state and federal courts issued a number of important product liability decisions in 2019. The Product Liability practice group at Nutter recently reviewed these cases. Highlighted below are some of the key...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: April 2018

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key California employment law cases are two decisions from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Chavez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 888 F.3d 413 (9th Cir. 2018) - Summary: Amount in controversy for federal...more

Maynard Nexsen

Amount in Controversy for Diversity Jurisdiction: How to Determine When Damages Are Not Clearly Stated

Maynard Nexsen on

Diversity jurisdiction exists when there is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Generally, the amount in controversy articulated in Plaintiff’s complaint is...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide