News & Analysis as of

Debt Collection Standing Financial Services Industry

Troutman Pepper

Oklahoma Federal Court Dismisses FDCPA Case Where the Debt was not Disputed

Troutman Pepper on

A U.S. District Court in the Western District of Oklahoma recently dismissed a lawsuit under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) for lack of Article III standing, finding the plaintiff did not actually dispute the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Plaintiffs declare that Fort Worth Chamber is the CFPB’s “natural adversary” in their opposition brief to the CFPB’s motion to...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On August 12, 2024, the plaintiffs filed their brief in opposition to the CFPB’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce (Fort Worth Chamber) for lack of standing and if granted, transfer the case to the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

CFPB files motion to dismiss Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce for lack of standing and if granted, renews its motion to transfer the...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On July 29, 2024, the CFPB filed a motion to dismiss the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce as a Plaintiff for lack of standing and if granted, transfer the case to a the Federal District Court for D.C. In its brief, the CFPB...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

Technical Violations of State Collection Practices Laws Can Lead to Class Action Liability

Hudson Cook, LLP on

If you are reading this article, you are likely aware that a creditor collecting its own debts in its own name is not a "debt collector" under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") or its implementing rule,...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Judge Pittman (N.D. Texas) questions whether Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce has standing to pursue claims seeking to invalidate...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

We recently reported that on July 18 the CFPB, upon remand from the Fifth Circuit, re-filed its notice of supplemental authority in support of its motion to dismiss or transfer the case, motion to dissolve the preliminary...more

Troutman Pepper

CFPB Moves to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction and Supplements Motion to Transfer in Credit Card Late Fee Rule Case; Court...

Troutman Pepper on

Last week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) filed a brief in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in support of its motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction that has stayed...more

Troutman Pepper

Third Circuit Holds “Confusion, Without More” Is Not Enough to Confer Standing Under the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recently underscored the fact that a plaintiff does not automatically gain Article III standing under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) simply because they are...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

3rd Circuit finds appellant does not have FDCPA standing where only injury was confusion

On April 26, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an appellant who sued a debt collector for allegedly violating the FDCPA did not have standing to bring her claim because she “failed to plead a concrete...more

Troutman Pepper

Missouri Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Challenge Compliance Condition Code on Consumer Report

Troutman Pepper on

A U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Missouri recently granted a defendant’s summary judgment motion in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case, holding that the plaintiff lacked standing because she did...more

Troutman Pepper

California Federal Court Rules Undated Model Debt Violation Notice Does Not Violate the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

In March, a district court in the Eastern District of California followed other courts holding that an undated, model form debt validation notice does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Specifically,...more

Troutman Pepper

Florida State Court Dismisses Letter Vendor Claim for Lack of Standing

Troutman Pepper on

In Scott v. Collecto, Inc., the plaintiff filed a complaint in state court alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and common law negligence based on the defendant’s use of a letter vendor to...more

Troutman Pepper

Letter Vendor Claim Remanded to State Court for Lack of Standing

Troutman Pepper on

In Moore v. Merchants & Medical Credit Corp., Inc., the plaintiff initiated litigation in state court alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) based on the defendant’s use of a letter vendor to...more

Troutman Pepper

New Jersey Federal Court Holds Bank Levy Provides Basis for Standing in FDCPA Case

Troutman Pepper on

On September 15, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the defendant’s summary judgment motion holding instead that a bank levy against the plaintiff served as a basis for standing to assert a claim...more

Troutman Pepper

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FDCPA Claim for Lack of Standing, Holding Hiring a Lawyer and Confusion is Not Enough

Troutman Pepper on

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a suit holding that the plaintiff had not suffered a concrete injury, and therefore, lacked standing to assert a claim under the Fair Debt...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

7th Circuit: Time and money spent responding to second verification request is sufficient for standing

On June 7, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that spending time and money to send a second verification request is enough to confer standing under the FDCPA. Plaintiff’s defaulted credit card debt was...more

Burr & Forman

Seventh Circuit Holds Bankruptcy Debtor Has No Standing to Assert FDCPA Claims

Burr & Forman on

In Pucillo v. National Credit Systems, Inc., No. 21-3131, 2023 WL 3090627 (7th Cir. Apr. 26, 2023), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of the plaintiff's FDCPA claims for lack of...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

8th Circuit reverses debt collection action for lack of standing

On February 24, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated and remanded the dismissal of a class action lawsuit concerning a medical collection letter that listed amounts due but did not distinguish between the...more

Cozen O'Connor

Neither Confusion nor Expense of Retaining Counsel Sufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA Case

Cozen O'Connor on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins was a game-changer. That decision single-handedly raised the bar for a plaintiff alleging a violation of a consumer protection statute such as the Fair Credit...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Financial...

The Hunstein Saga Ends at the Eleventh Circuit: Court Determines That Use of a Mail Vendor Did Not Inflict a Concrete Injury

On September 8, 2022, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals gave its final word—after many twists and turns—in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., No. 19-14434. The court issued an en banc opinion...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Debt Collection Letter Case For Lack of Standing

On September 8, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an order in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. dismissing the case after determining that plaintiff failed to allege a...more

Baker Donelson

In Reversing Hunstein, the Eleventh Circuit Stands Firm on Standing, But Other Questions Remain

Baker Donelson on

On September 8, 2022, following an en banc review, the Eleventh Circuit issued its much-awaited new decision in the Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services action, which involves a claimed violation of the...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Tests for Article III Standing, Changes Course on FDCPA and Mailing Vendors

Burr & Forman on

On September 8, 2022, in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. , No. 19-14434, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an en banc decision which departs significantly from the panel decision on...more

Burr & Forman

Standing Room Only – Eighth Circuit Holds that Non-Consumer Attorney Lacks Standing to Bring FDCPA Claim

Burr & Forman on

In Magdy v. I.C. Sys., Inc., No. 21-3010, 2022 WL 4075764, at *1 (8th Cir. Sept. 6, 2022), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, faced with a matter of first impression, held that a non-consumer attorney could not bring an...more

Burr & Forman

Seventh Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Claim for Lack of Standing

Burr & Forman on

In Pierre v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., — F.4th —, 2022 WL 986441 (7th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022), the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), finding that the...more

Burr & Forman

Copycat Case Considers and Rejects Eleventh Circuit FDCPA Ruling

Burr & Forman on

The latest update surrounding Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., Case No. 19-14434 centers not on the Eleventh Circuit or the Hunstein decision itself but on the district courts nationwide that...more

64 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide