News & Analysis as of

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act › Certiorari

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a United States federal statute signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act was passed in response to the Great Recession of the late 2000s and... more +
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a United States federal statute signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act was passed in response to the Great Recession of the late 2000s and includes broad reforms related to many aspects of the financial and banking industry. Notable sections of the Act include stricter regulations of the derivatives market, as well as the Volcker Rule, which restricts the trading practices of FDIC-insured institutions.    less -
Foley & Lardner LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules SEC Must Try Securities Fraud Cases in Federal Jury Trials Rather than In-House Courts

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that when the SEC seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial. In a 6–3 decision, Chief Justice...more

Troutman Pepper

Amici Argue for Narrow Interpretation of National Bank Act Preemption

Troutman Pepper on

A group of non-profit consumer advocacy organizations, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators filed two separate briefs asking the U.S. Supreme Court to...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Consumer Finance Monitor Podcast Episode: What the Recent Developments in Federal Preemption for National and State Banks Mean for...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Providers of consumer financial services that rely on federal preemption to charge customers uniform interest rates and fees on a nationwide basis are currently facing a series of legislative and litigation challenges. In...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court to Hear National Bank Act Preemption Case

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to address whether state laws that require national banks to pay 2% annual interest on residential mortgage escrow accounts are preempted by the National Bank Act (NBA) and thus inapplicable...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Grants Cert for Interest-on-Escrow Preemption Case

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari to hear the Second Circuit case of Cantero et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., involving National Bank Act (NBA) preemption of New York’s law requiring that interest be paid to...more

Saiber LLC

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Case Concerning State Regulation of Federal Banks

Saiber LLC on

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., a case that concerns the power of states to regulate federally-chartered banks. The Court has granted review of the case despite the...more

Troutman Pepper

Fed Considering Revisions to Debit Interchange Fee Cap

Troutman Pepper on

On October 16, the Federal Reserve Board (Fed) published a notice of an Open Board Meeting to take place on October 25. The only matter under consideration at that meeting will be the Fed’s proposed revisions to the debit...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court to Decide Commencement of APA Statute of Limitations Period in Debit Card Fee Challenge

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted the petition for certiorari in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), a case where Corner Post challenges a 2011 Board rule that governs certain fees...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The Supreme Court Will Determine When Federal Agencies Must Provide for the Right to a Jury Trial in Civil Enforcement Actions

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The United States Supreme Court recently granted Certiorari in a closely watched case that could have significant consequences for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and certain other federal administrative...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Supreme Court will review Fifth Circuit decision holding CFPB’s funding unconstitutional

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear a challenge to an October decision by a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals holding that the CFPB’s funding mechanism is unconstitutional. The Court will...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Holds That Part of CFPB’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Seila Law v. CFPB. Authoring the opinion for a five-justice majority, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Wrestles with Constitutional Challenge to the CFPB

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court heard argument on March 3, 2020, in Seila Law v. CFPB. The case involves a constitutional challenge to the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by a California law firm under...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS hears oral argument in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday morning in Seila Law.  The two questions before the Court are whether the provision in Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act that only allows the President to remove the CFPB...more

A&O Shearman

Overview Of Cases Of Particular Interest Currently Pending Before The Supreme Court Of The United States

A&O Shearman on

Looking ahead, we preview cases currently pending before the Supreme Court—which have already been accepted for review by the Court—that may be of particular interest to readers of the Need-to-Know Litigation Weekly.  These...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to consider Collins cert petitions on Jan. 10

Ballard Spahr LLP on

At its conference this Friday, January 10, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to consider the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the plaintiffs in Collins v. Mnuchin and the petition filed by the FHFA and Treasury...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seila Law and CFPB file briefs in U.S. Supreme Court

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Seila Law and the CFPB filed their briefs yesterday in the U.S. Supreme Court.  Both briefs address the question presented in Seila Law’s certiorari petition, which is whether the CFPB’s...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS sets March 3 oral argument in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument in Seila Law on March 3, 2020. The question presented in Seila Law’s petition is whether the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure violates the...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Structure of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau is Constitutional

Burr & Forman on

On October 18, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari filed in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In granting the petition, the Court agreed to take up two distinct issues....more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal Challenging Constitutionality of CFPB’s Single-Director Structure

King & Spalding on

On October 18, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a decision from the Ninth Circuit that affirmed the constitutionality of the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). The CFPB is an agency...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS sets briefing schedule in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has set a briefing schedule in Seila Law, in which the questions before the court are whether the CFPB’s structure is constitutional and, if it is not, whether the court can sever the provision in the...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of the CFPB

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &... on

The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a challenge to the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). While the CFPB won in the Ninth Circuit, the agency has since changed its mind and now...more

Alston & Bird

Supreme Court to Decide CFPB’s Constitutionality

Alston & Bird on

A&B ABstract: On October 18, 2019, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Seila Law v. CFPB to decide the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s leadership structure....more

Saul Ewing LLP

Will Dismissal Only “For Cause” Be the Downfall of the CFPB?

Saul Ewing LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in the matter of Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to address the question of whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB)...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - October 21, 2019

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the following four cases: Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, No. 19-7: (1) Whether the vesting of substantial executive...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to decide CFPB’s constitutionality

Ballard Spahr LLP on

This past Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it has agreed to decide whether the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure is constitutional.  The Court granted Seila Law’s petition for a writ of...more

32 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide