News & Analysis as of

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act › Supreme Court of the United States › Administrative Proceedings

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a United States federal statute signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act was passed in response to the Great Recession of the late 2000s and... more +
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a United States federal statute signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act was passed in response to the Great Recession of the late 2000s and includes broad reforms related to many aspects of the financial and banking industry. Notable sections of the Act include stricter regulations of the derivatives market, as well as the Volcker Rule, which restricts the trading practices of FDIC-insured institutions.    less -
Benesch

Will Jarkesy Be a Fatal Blow to Civil Enforcement in Administrative Agency Proceedings?

Benesch on

The end of the Supreme Court’s recent term saw two major decisions in the field of administrative law: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. The Loper Bright decision, which...more

Balch & Bingham LLP

Ripple Effects Of SEC Adjudication Ruling May Be Momentous

Balch & Bingham LLP on

Suppose that your nemesis has a legal beef with you, and you learn that the law allows him to appoint one of his employees to judge the case. Shocked? You should be. Yet federal agency adjudication works the same way. How...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments for June 2024

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

Each month, we publish a roundup of the most important SEC enforcement developments for busy in-house lawyers and compliance professionals. This month, we examine: •The Supreme Court’s Jarkesy decision and its impact on the...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court Limits SEC Administrative Actions, Upholds Defendants’ Right to a Jury

BakerHostetler on

On Thursday, June 27, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that the Seventh Amendment entitles a defendant to a jury trial in instances where the SEC seeks civil penalties against that defendant for alleged securities...more

Dechert LLP

Supreme Court Curtails SEC In-House Judges on Litigated Civil Penalties

Dechert LLP on

In SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court held that the Seventh Amendment entitles a defendant to a jury trial when the SEC seeks civil penalties for securities fraud. The decision limits the SEC’s authority to seek civil...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Deals Blow to SEC’s In-House Enforcement Powers

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the administrative adjudication by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of securities fraud cases seeking civil penalties violates the Seventh Amendment right to a...more

Bracewell LLP

Supreme Court Declares SEC Lacks In-House Authority to Impose Civil Penalties

Bracewell LLP on

The United States Supreme Court struck another major blow to the Securities Exchange Commission’s enforcement arsenal, finding that its oft-used practice of imposing monetary penalties in its in-house administrative...more

Jackson Walker

White Collar Docket Check: US Supreme Court to Decide Key Administrative, Whistleblower, and Due Process Cases This Term

Jackson Walker on

The U.S. Supreme Court began its new term this week and is taking cases government enforcement practitioners will want to follow. Specifically, the Court will address issues concerning: the interplay between SEC...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Fifth Circuit rules CFPB’s structure is constitutional

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On Tuesday March 3, the same day that the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Seila Law, the Fifth Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, ruled in All American Check Cashing that the CFPB’s structure is constitutional....more

A&O Shearman

Overview Of Cases Of Particular Interest Currently Pending Before The Supreme Court Of The United States

A&O Shearman on

Looking ahead, we preview cases currently pending before the Supreme Court—which have already been accepted for review by the Court—that may be of particular interest to readers of the Need-to-Know Litigation Weekly.  These...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

No action from SCOTUS on Collins cert petitions

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The orders released today by the U.S. Supreme Court from its January 10 conference did not include any orders regarding the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the plaintiffs in Collins v. Mnuchin or the petition filed...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to consider Collins cert petitions on Jan. 10

Ballard Spahr LLP on

At its conference this Friday, January 10, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to consider the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the plaintiffs in Collins v. Mnuchin and the petition filed by the FHFA and Treasury...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS denies certiorari petition filed by All American Check Cashing

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment filed by All American Check Cashing. In its petition, All American sought to have the Supreme Court hear its interlocutory appeal from...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Structure of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau is Constitutional

Burr & Forman on

On October 18, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari filed in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In granting the petition, the Court agreed to take up two distinct issues....more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal Challenging Constitutionality of CFPB’s Single-Director Structure

King & Spalding on

On October 18, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a decision from the Ninth Circuit that affirmed the constitutionality of the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). The CFPB is an agency...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS sets briefing schedule in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has set a briefing schedule in Seila Law, in which the questions before the court are whether the CFPB’s structure is constitutional and, if it is not, whether the court can sever the provision in the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to decide CFPB’s constitutionality

Ballard Spahr LLP on

This past Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it has agreed to decide whether the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure is constitutional.  The Court granted Seila Law’s petition for a writ of...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

New plot twist: CFPB agrees its structure is unconstitutional

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The long-running saga that is the litigation over whether the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure is constitutional took a new twist on Tuesday with the CFPB’s announcement that it has determined that...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seila Law to seek U.S. Supreme Court review of Ninth Circuit ruling that CFPB’s structure is constitutional

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Appellant Seila Law has filed a motion for a stay of the Ninth Circuit’s mandate in its decision ruling that the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure is constitutional pending the filing by Seila Law of a...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Top SCOTUS Cases Tech Companies Should Watch – Fall 2017 Preview

Fenwick & West LLP on

The upcoming U.S. Supreme Court term promises to be a big one, featuring a patent case that could be a game changer for many clients and a host of other cases that may affect how tech and life sciences companies deal with...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Corporate Investigations & White Collar Defense - October 2015

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

"Wherefore Art Thou Due Process?" Part III - Why it matters: It is time for another installment in our continuing "Wherefore Art Thou Due Process?" coverage into the ongoing constitutional challenges to the SEC's...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Financial Services Report, Fall 2015

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

BELTWAY - Straight Out of the Seventh Circuit The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed a lower court’s ruling that the SEC cannot be sued in district court to stop it from bringing an administrative action. Bebo v. SEC, No....more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide