News & Analysis as of

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act › Supreme Court of the United States › Oral Argument

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a United States federal statute signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act was passed in response to the Great Recession of the late 2000s and... more +
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a United States federal statute signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act was passed in response to the Great Recession of the late 2000s and includes broad reforms related to many aspects of the financial and banking industry. Notable sections of the Act include stricter regulations of the derivatives market, as well as the Volcker Rule, which restricts the trading practices of FDIC-insured institutions.    less -
Ballard Spahr LLP

Trade groups file lawsuit in Texas federal court challenging CFPB final credit card late fee rule and ask for preliminary...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Just two days after the CFPB issued its final credit card late fee rule (Rule) last week, a lawsuit was filed in a Texas federal district court seeking to invalidate the Rule. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are the Chamber of...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America provides no clear indication of likely outcome

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On February 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., a case involving the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the scope of preemption under the National Bank Act (NBA). The...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Important National Bank Act (NBA) preemption case to be argued Today, February 27, before US Supreme Court

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. will be heard on Tuesday, February 27 before the US Supreme Court. The Court recently granted the unopposed motion of the Solicitor General to participate in the oral...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Bank of America files merits brief with SCOTUS in National Bank Act preemption case; DOJ seeks leave to participate in oral...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Bank of America, N.A. has filed its merits brief in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., the case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court dealing with the scope of national bank preemption.  The petitioners must file their reply...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Agency Tasked With Helping Students Make Informed Decisions About Paying for College

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a government agency that protects consumers in the financial sector, is potentially at risk following oral argument on October 3, 2023, before the Supreme Court of the United...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Clues On High Court Outcome In CFPB Constitutionality Case

McGlinchey Stafford on

On October 3, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, the latest in a long line of cases targeting the constitutionality...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on the Constitutionality of the Funding of the CFPB

Goodwin on

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 3, 2023 in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. The issue before  the Court is whether the CFPB’s funding...more

Venable LLP

C[FPB] You Later? Agency’s Future Hangs in the Balance After Oral Argument

Venable LLP on

On October 3, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited, where the Court is reviewing the Fifth Circuit’s opinion that struck...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on Whether CFPB's Funding Mechanism Is Constitutional

Hudson Cook, LLP on

On October 3, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America. At issue is the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding structure,...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Denies Oral Argument to Republican State AGs Who Argue That the CFPB Funding Mechanism Is Unconstitutional

Troutman Pepper on

On August 21, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request by West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey and 26 other state AGs to participate in oral arguments in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) et al. v....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Wrestles with Constitutional Challenge to the CFPB

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court heard argument on March 3, 2020, in Seila Law v. CFPB. The case involves a constitutional challenge to the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by a California law firm under...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS hears oral argument in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday morning in Seila Law.  The two questions before the Court are whether the provision in Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act that only allows the President to remove the CFPB...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS enters order dividing and enlarging time for oral argument in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court entered an order last Friday that divides and enlarges the time for oral argument in Seila Law, which is scheduled for March 3. ...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seila Law files motion with SCOTUS to enlarge and divide oral argument time

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Seila Law has filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court requesting an enlargement of the time allocated for oral argument (scheduled for March 3) and a division of the time to accommodate “the unusual circumstances for oral...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seila Law and CFPB file briefs in U.S. Supreme Court

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Seila Law and the CFPB filed their briefs yesterday in the U.S. Supreme Court.  Both briefs address the question presented in Seila Law’s certiorari petition, which is whether the CFPB’s...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS sets March 3 oral argument in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument in Seila Law on March 3, 2020. The question presented in Seila Law’s petition is whether the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure violates the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ninth Circuit puts hold on CashCall appeal pending SCOTUS decision in Seila Law; CFPB asks Second Circuit to adjourn oral argument...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

As expected, the U.S. Supreme Court’s grant of Seila Law’s cert petition is impacting other cases in which the CFPB’s constitutionality has also been challenged. ...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Whistleblower Developments is a periodic report covering significant cases, decisions, proposals, and legislation related to whistleblower statutes and how they may impact your business. Recent developments include: ...more

A&O Shearman

Supreme Court Oral Argument Suggests Skepticism Over SEC Rule Protecting Internal Whistleblowers From Retaliation Under Dodd-Frank...

A&O Shearman on

On November 28, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, No. 16-1276, a case that raises the question whether an employee who reported alleged misconduct internally, but did not...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide