What's the Tea in L&E? Mouse Jigglers: WFH Fraud
How to Combat Corporate Theft: Office Space – Crossover Episode With the Hiring to Firing Podcast - The Consumer Finance Podcast
DE Under 3: The Coming Harvard & UNC Case Decisions and NLRB’s Memo on Electronic Surveillance and Organizing
Employment Law Now VI-121 - Top 5 Fall Things You Need To Know
#WorkforceWednesday: "Quiet Quitting" Legal Pitfalls, NYC Automated Decision Tools Law, Twitter Cybersecurity Whistleblower Claims - Employment Law This Week®
1984 in the Workplace — Is Employee Surveillance Trending?
#WorkforceWednesday: NYC Pay Transparency Law, Florida Diversity Training, and Cal/OSHA’s COVID-19 ETS - Employment Law This Week®
New NYS Law about Electronic Monitoring Takes Effect May 7
Social Media and Electronic Monitoring Considerations For Employers
#WorkforceWednesday: OSHA ETS Moves to the Sixth Circuit, Federal Agencies Join to Combat Workplace Retaliation, NY Increases Employee Protections - Employment Law This Week®
NGE On Demand: Privacy Considerations for Remote Work Productivity Monitoring with David Wheeler
Teleworking: Amazing or amazingly complex?
I’ll be watching you: The ins and outs of employee monitoring
Cass. soc., 31 janvier 2024, n°22-18.792 La lettre de licenciement n’a pas à préciser la date des faits invoqués. Un salarié licencié pour faute grave conteste la rupture de son contrat de travail, en se fondant notamment...more
Cass. soc., 31 January 2024, n°22-18.792 - A dismissal letter does not have to specify the date of the alleged acts. An employee dismissed for gross misconduct contested the termination of his employment contract, citing...more
The Regional Labor Court in Tel Aviv recently ruled that an employer that installed surveillance cameras in the workplace caused a tangible adverse change in its employee’s employment conditions. The employee resigned from...more
The Korean Supreme Court has held that employees were justified in covering security cameras that had been installed without proper consultation....more
A U.S.-based employer faced legal consequences after it terminated a remote employee in the Netherlands who refused to keep his camera on for the whole nine-hour workday. The Dutch Court held that the dismissal of the...more