News & Analysis as of

European Commission European Court of Justice (ECJ) Competition

A&O Shearman

Loyalty rebates: a final word from the European Court of Justice in Intel?

A&O Shearman on

In May 2009, the European Commission (EC) fined Intel EUR1.06 billion for abusing its dominant position in the x86 microprocessor market (CPUs). The EC concluded that Intel had granted anticompetitive loyalty rebates to...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Intel’s EUR 1 Billion Fine Overturned: ECJ’s Landmark Ruling

McDermott Will & Emery on

On October 24, 2024, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) confirmed the annulment by the General Court (GC) of the European Commission’s (EC) decision to impose a EUR 1.06 billion fine on Intel for the abuse of a dominant...more

A&O Shearman

Antitrust in focus - September 2024

A&O Shearman on

This newsletter is a summary of the antitrust developments we think are most interesting to your business. James Webber (partner based in London) and Jess Bowring (counsel based in London) are our editors this month. They...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

European Commission Blocked From Reviewing Below-Threshold Mergers

On September 3, 2024, the European Union’s Court of Justice (ECJ) issued its highly anticipated judgment in the Illumina/Grail case (C-611/22 P and C-625/22 P) concerning the European Commission’s (EC’s) power to review...more

Mayer Brown

Below the thresholds but on the radar | What’s next after the ECJ's Illumina/Grail judgment?

Mayer Brown on

With its eagerly-awaited Illumina/Grail judgment on 3 September 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) closed a transatlantic saga and rejected the European Commission's ("Commission") extended...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Illumina/Grail: EU Court Overturns Below-Threshold Merger Review Policy

On September 3, 2024, the EU’s highest court, the European Court of Justice (ECJ), ruled that the European Commission (EC) had no jurisdiction to review Illumina’s acquisition of Grail, overturning the EU’s revised Article 22...more

K&L Gates LLP

Court of Justice Confirms European Commission's Duty to Pay Interest Over Unlawfully Levied Fines

K&L Gates LLP on

In the recent years we have seen exponential increases in the amount of fines imposed by the European Commission (Commission) for infringements of competition rules, fines in the range of hundreds of millions or even billions...more

A&O Shearman

New twist in the Illumina/GRAIL saga: Advocate General challenges European Commission’s power to review below-threshold mergers

A&O Shearman on

In a much-anticipated opinion, Advocate General Nicholas Emiliou (AG) has advised the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to set aside the General Court (GC)’s Illumina/GRAIL judgment. The AG is of the view that the European...more

Mayer Brown

Europe's Highest Court Affirms 'Broad' Opportunities for Intervention by Professional Associations

Mayer Brown on

Introduction - Allowing third parties to intervene in front of judges raises several issues of fundamental importance. For example, the need for decision makers to have access to all relevant information, and the...more

K&L Gates LLP

Brussels Regulatory Brief: Winter 2023-2024

K&L Gates LLP on

Antitrust and Competition - The European Court of Justice Held Rules Set by Sports Governing Bodies Must Comply With EU Competition Law - On 21 December 2023, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held in a preliminary ruling...more

A&O Shearman

ECJ’s “gun jumping” ruling reminds merging parties of the importance of EU merger control compliance

A&O Shearman on

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has (mostly) confirmed the European Commission (EC)’s decision to fine Altice for implementing a transaction prior to its notification and the EC’s merger control clearance....more

A&O Shearman

Third annual report on EU foreign investment reveals a significant increase in formal screenings

A&O Shearman on

The European Commission (EC)’s third annual report on EU foreign direct investment (FDI) screening covers the operation of the screening mechanism in 2022. Together with a Commission Staff Working Document, it details...more

Jones Day

ECJ Antitrust Ruling Not Likely to Jump-Start EC Deal Challenges in "Gap Cases"

Jones Day on

In Short - The Development: The Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") annulled a General Court ("GC") ruling that had adopted a high standard of proof for the European Commission ("EC") to block transactions in...more

K&L Gates LLP

Brussels Regulatory Brief: June-July 2023

K&L Gates LLP on

ANTITRUST AND COMPETITION - The Court of Justice Overturns the General Court’s Judgment Annulling the European Commission’s Prohibition Decision in the Telecom Sector - On 13 July 2023, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) set...more

A&O Shearman

ECJ confirms no higher standard for blocking mergers short of dominance

A&O Shearman on

On 13 July 2023, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) gave judgment on the long-running litigation between CK Hutchison and the European Commission (EC), arising out of the EC’s 2016 decision to prohibit CK Hutchison (owner of...more

White & Case LLP

EU Court of Justice in CK Telecoms sides with the European Commission's approach to mergers in oligopolistic markets

White & Case LLP on

The EU Court of Justice in the CK Telecoms1 ruling has addressed key questions of EU merger control, including the standard of proof for the European Commission to challenge a merger, the assessment of mergers below the...more

BCLP

Formalism on the Chopping Bock - the ECJ’s judgment in Super Bock

BCLP on

The ECJ’s recent preliminary ruling in C-211/22 - Super Bock Bebidas (“Super Bock”) is significant for businesses and competition authorities. It is well-established that categorisation of conduct as a ‘by object’...more

White & Case LLP

EU Court of Justice provides guidance on resale price maintenance under EU competition law – the judgement in Super Bock

White & Case LLP on

The fact that the European Commission (EC) classified resale price maintenance as a hardcore restriction under its Vertical Block Exemption Regulation does not mean that it automatically violates EU competition law as a "by...more

White & Case LLP

ECJ Advocate General supports the European Commission’s broad interpretation of gun-jumping and the importance of deterrence in...

White & Case LLP on

Advocate General Anthony Michael Collins has proposed that the European Court of Justice uphold the General Court's Altice judgment. In his Opinion, he considered that the entering into certain types of pre-closing covenants...more

A&O Shearman

The European Court of Justice Resurrects an Old Tool to Tackle Below Threshold Mergers

A&O Shearman on

Overview - - The European Court of Justice (CJEU) brought back to life an old theory which allows acquisitions, which fall below EU and national merger control thresholds, to be challenged post-completion under abuse of...more

White & Case LLP

European Court of Justice confirms that national authorities can review ex-post below-threshold mergers under abuse of dominance...

White & Case LLP on

The long-awaited European Court of Justice's judgment in Towercast confirmed that national competition authorities (and national courts) can apply abuse of dominance rules to mergers that did not trigger EU and national...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

European Court Expands Legal Professional Privilege in the EU

In a recent judgment, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) expanded the scope of Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) in the EU, recognizing that it is not limited to advice given for the purpose of defense but covers all...more

White & Case LLP

ECJ Advocate General recommends setting aside the CK Telecoms judgment and endorsing the European Commission’s established...

White & Case LLP on

Advocate General Kokott has found that the General Court erred in law in requiring the European Commission to show anti-competitive effects of a merger with “strong probability” and that the scope of its judicial review was...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

The European Court of Justice Resolves Certain Conflicts of Temporal Application of the “Damages” Directive

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a judgment on June 22, 2022 (C-267/20), regarding an action for damages, based on Directive 2014/104/EU (Directive), seeking compensation for the damage caused by the truck cartel....more

White & Case LLP

Lessons from the EU General Court’s recent rejections of two appeals of merger prohibitions (Wieland, Thyssenkrupp)

White & Case LLP on

On 18 May and 22 June 2022, the EU General Court upheld two European Commission prohibition decisions. Both judgments endorsed the European Commission's assessment of the mergers at issue, recognising a broad margin of...more

42 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide