Podcast - The Basic Rules for Closing Argument
Closing Argument: Opportunity and Challenge
Podcast - Impeaching with a Deposition
Winning Cases on Legal Issues Before and During Trial | Texas Appellate Law Podcast
Opening Statements: The Prohibition Against Argument
Proof in Trial: University of Louisville
Work This Way: A Labor & Employment Law Podcast - Episode 6: Digital Forensics & Protecting Trade Secrets with Clark Walton
Dealing with Evidence of Time, Distance and Speed
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 417: Listen and Learn -- Authentication of Evidence
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 410: Listen and Learn -- Relevance Issues (Evidence)
Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast Episode 225: Listen and Learn -- Authentication of Evidence
Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast Episode 214: Listen and Learn -- Relevance Issues (Evidence)
California Employment News: Synthesizing Evidence in a Workplace Investigation (Part 3)
Evidence Preservation: Handling the Issues in New York and New Jersey
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 352: Listen and Learn -- Best Evidence Rule
Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast Episode 182: Listen and Learn -- Policy Exclusions (Evidence)
Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast Episode 177: Listen and Learn -- Best Evidence Rule
Facing a Deposition: Tips and Strategies
The Presumption of Innocence Podcast: Episode 3 - The Science of Modern Digital Forensics
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 326: Listen and Learn -- Multiple Hearsay
Two recent court rulings provide a roadmap for Florida employees and their attorneys to take their claims all the way to trial by building a convincing mosaic of circumstantial evidence. This means that now more than ever,...more
With high-profile challenges to employer diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and “reverse discrimination” claims on the rise, a case reinforcing the circuit split over whether plaintiffs from a “majority” group...more
Our February update includes new cases on marital status discrimination, including a general refresher on direct discrimination, a case of whether private WhatsApp messages can be used in tribunal proceedings, and how to deal...more
The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP) have been used by EEOC, OFCCP, and the courts to regulate, litigate, and enforce anti-discrimination laws in the use of employee selection practices since their...more
The UK Supreme Court decision in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi confirms that employees must still prove facts from which a tribunal could draw an inference of discrimination before their claim can proceed, despite a change of...more
In the spirit of the upcoming Super Bowl, it is important to keep in mind certain rules of play regarding forfeiture of arguments in federal courts of appeals. The Tenth Circuit reiterated two such rules in recent opinions....more
Add this case to your “Be Sure to Document Your Non-Discriminatory Reasons” file. An employee doing bad things lost on summary judgment in an employment discrimination action, even though she alleged that the company did not...more
The New York City Commission on Human Rights has issued new enforcement guidance on discrimination based on actual or perceived national origin or immigration status in employment, as well as in housing and public...more
If your employee sues you for discrimination, they don’t get to look at how the decision-makers treated everyone else, do they? Well, in Cruz vs. US Homeland Security, the D.C. Court of Appeals says yes they do. Although the...more
It’s tempting for employers to shrug off the allegations contained in a charge of discrimination or similar agency filing – viewing them as unfounded, unsupported and self-serving. Or worse, an employer may attack the...more
The proper standard for comparator evidence in cases alleging intentional discrimination is “similarly situated in all material aspects,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has clarified in an en banc ruling....more
On March 21, 2019, in a 9-3 en banc decision, the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the “similarly situated” standard for comparator evidence in employment discrimination cases. Lewis v. City of Union City,...more
Can an organist really be considered a church minister? In a detailed and unique opinion, an Illinois federal court applied the First Amendment’s religious clauses to a church employee who claimed he had been discriminated...more
Seyfarth Synopsis: In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit clarifies that plaintiffs need not present a “convincing mosaic” of direct or indirect evidence of discrimination to withstand summary judgment. Rather, the...more
Most employees who file employment discrimination claims hope for one of two things – a really sympathetic jury or an employer that is willing to generously settle the lawsuit to avoid the risks and uncertainties of trial. ...more
In Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit clarified its standard for evaluating evidence in employment discrimination cases and rejected prior decisions to the extent they...more
Sometimes a judge says what many of us are already thinking. In Rivera v. Crowell & Moring L.L.P., Katherine B. Forrest was that judge....more
Last week, we talked about 20 things an employer should ask itself before terminating an employee. In the interests of fairness, here are 10 things that an employee should ask before suing an employer. You should know that I...more