News & Analysis as of

False Advertising Trademark Litigation Appeals

McDermott Will & Emery

Well-Pleaded Factual Allegations Must Be Taken as True When Considering Motion to Dismiss

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in dismissing a trademark infringement matter under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, ruled that a district court “erroneously assumed the veracity” of the defendants’...more

Erise IP

What’s Trending in Trademarks, March 2024: Chanel Reseller Found Liable for Trademark Infringement, False Advertising; Federal...

Erise IP on

Every month, Erise’s trademark attorneys review the latest developments at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in the courts, and across the corporate world to bring you the stories that you should know about: Chanel...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Personal Jurisdiction? Selling Products via Interactive Website Will Do It

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, deciding that the sale of a product via an interactive website provides sufficient “minimum...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Veil Piercing Under Lanham Act Requires Specific Showing of Liability

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court decision granting summary judgment of liability under the Lanham Act, finding that the plaintiffs failed to apply the correct standards for piercing...more

McDermott Will & Emery

No Harm, No Foul: No False Advertisement Where Trade Association Failed to Show Injury

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a home inspector association on a false advertising claim brought by a competitor, finding no evidence of injury...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Initial Confusion? Relax, Eighth Circuit Has Your Number

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing a novel issue regarding when confusion must occur for it to be actionable, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concluded that initial-interest confusion was a viable infringement theory. Select Comfort...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Fairness Is the Limit for Asserting False Advertising Claims

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing whether Lanham Act claims for false advertising or false association under § 43(a) (15 USC § 1125(a)) are subject to a statute of limitations, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that the sole...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide