News & Analysis as of

Federal Court Litigation

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Federal Judge Vacates SEC’s Dealer Rule Amendments and Gensler Announces Imminent Departure

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On Thursday, in two separate decisions, a federal district court in Texas struck down the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rule that expanded the definition of “dealer” to include proprietary traders and some...more

Kerr Russell

FTC’s Ban on Covenants Not to Compete Remains on Hold

Kerr Russell on

The legal arguments advanced in these court cases mainly concern whether the FTC has the statutory authority to enact such a ban. Shortly before the September 4, 2024 effective date of FTC’s ban on covenants not to compete,...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Dismissal of State Court Claims Bars DTSA Claim in Federal Court

Holland & Knight LLP on

By statute, judgments of state courts are entitled to the same preclusive effect in subsequent federal litigation as they would have in subsequent state court litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1738. A recent decision by the U.S. Court...more

A&O Shearman

Jurisdictional challenges to enjoining or staying international arbitrations in US courts

A&O Shearman on

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delawares recent decision in Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Notarc Port Investment LLC further deepens the split among U.S. federal courts regarding jurisdiction under...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Ninth Circuit Affirms Tribal Court Jurisdiction Over Insurance Provider

Snell & Wilmer on

On February 29, 2024, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Lexington Insurance Co. v. Smith (Suquamish Tribe). The Court affirmed the tribal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over Lexington pursuant to the Tribe’s...more

Cornerstone Research

Securities Class Action Filing Activity Increased Slightly in 2023, Reversing Recent Years’ Declines

Cornerstone Research on

The number of securities class action lawsuits increased slightly in 2023, reversing the trend of decline over the last three consecutive years, according to a report released today by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford...more

Goldberg Segalla

CA Federal District Court Grants Dismissal In Favor of Personal Care Manufacturer in PFAS Misrepresentation Action

Goldberg Segalla on

On January 12, 2024, a northern California federal district court dismissed the PFAS-related class-action case of Lowe v. Edgewell Personal Care Company on the grounds that its plaintiffs had not plausibly alleged injury from...more

Tyson & Mendes LLP

The California Insurance Code and Willful Acts

Tyson & Mendes LLP on

Companies facing lawsuits involving alleged claims of willful acts have had a rude awakening following the ruling in The Wonderful Co. LLC et al. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. by a California federal court that came at...more

Hendershot Cowart P.C.

Federal Vs. State Court: How Do You Determine Where To File A Lawsuit?

Hendershot Cowart P.C. on

How do you determine whether a case should be heard in state court or federal court? Lawsuits can be filed in either state or federal court, depending on where the litigants live or do business, the type of case, the amount...more

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Federal Court Finally Issues an Opinion Analyzing LEG 3 (and It’s a Win for Policyholders)

The London Engineering Group’s LEG 3 exclusion—one of three standard form provisions issued by the London Engineering Group addressing coverage arising from construction or design defects—is an increasingly common defects...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds no procedural unfairness in Minister of Health’s decision that smoking cessation aid not a natural health...

Smart & Biggar on

On November 2, 2023, the Federal Court dismissed The Winning Combination (TWC)’s application for judicial review of Health Canada’s decision to refuse a natural health product licence for Resolve, a smoking cessation aid:...more

Bennett Jones LLP

The Federal Court Rules that the Order Labelling Plastics as a Toxic Substance is Unreasonable and Unconstitutional

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Federal Court of Canada (Court) released its decision on November 16, 2023, in Responsible Plastics Use Coalition v Canada, which held that the Federal Government's labelling of all Plastic Manufactured Items (PMI) as...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Government Shutdown Impact: What Stays Open and What Closes

Foley Hoag LLP on

As we near a standoff in Congress on the budget, we write to remind clients about how a government shutdown would affect patent and trademark operations at the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), copyright operations at the...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Federal court strikes down DACA regulation, DACA still on life support

A federal judge has struck down final regulations regarding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and the program itself may not survive. The DACA program was established unilaterally in 2012 by an Obama...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

Federal Court Rules No Common Law Duty to Prevent or Respond to Data Breaches

Like most healthcare entities, Indiana’s Trinity Health collects, stores, maintains and uses a large volume of particularly sensitive information about patients and others, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII)...more

Willcox & Savage

Finding More Time to Perfect Removal to Federal Court

Willcox & Savage on

Even practitioners well-accustomed to federal practice often overlook the critical rule regarding the deadline for removal when a defendant has been served through a statutory agent, an agent appointed to receive process by...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

Stateless Amber Heard: The Legal Loophole to Avoid Being Sued in Federal Court

The Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial captured the world’s attention in 2022. Two years after the couple divorced, Heard described surviving domestic violence in an op-ed for The Washington Post. Although Heard never mentioned...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

SCOTUS endorses "existential" challenge to administrative agencies

Labor lawyers, take note. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that doesn’t address employment law directly, but it certainly does indirectly. Labor lawyers in particular need to watch this. In Axon...more

Smart & Biggar

[Ongoing Program] Contentious trademark proceedings: What brand owners should know about defending and enforcing their rights in...

Smart & Biggar on

This spring, join our Smart & Biggar trademark experts and gain new insights at our popular Canadian Trademarks webinar series. Each webinar provides practical tips and strategies for global brand protection in Canada, with a...more

J.S. Held

COVID-19’s Effects on Grand Juries, Indictments & Jeopardy to Defendants’ Rights

J.S. Held on

The COVID-19 pandemic has collided with the constitutional requirement that “infamous” crimes be charged by a grand jury. For the first time in United States history, grand juries in federal courts have been suspended because...more

Felicello Law PC

You Can’t Always Get What You Want (In Federal Court)

Felicello Law PC on

We all know that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. What does that mean in the arbitration context? Something new as of March 31st! Federal courts do not have stand-alone jurisdiction to hear any...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

California Court of Appeal Upholds Federal Forum Provision Covering State-Court IPO Securities Class Actions

Latham & Watkins LLP on

On April 28, 2022, the California Court of Appeal issued a much-anticipated decision in Wong v. Restoration Robotics, Case No. A161489, enforcing a forum selection clause contained in a corporate charter provision that...more

Littler

Court Holds Plaintiffs Are Precluded from Asserting New York Wage Theft Prevention Act Claims in Federal Court

Littler on

In a series of significant recent decisions, Judge Pamela K. Chen of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, held that federal courts lack jurisdiction to hear claims alleging violations of New York’s wage...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Kansas Federal Court Holds Notice-Prejudice Rule Inapplicable to Claims-Made Policies

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas, applying Kansas law, has held that the notice-prejudice rule does not apply to claims-made policies. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. Great Plains Annual Conference...more

Bennett Jones LLP

The Federal Court of Appeal Has Weighed in on Re-Evaluation Decisions Made by the Pest Management Regulatory

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Federal Court of Appeal in Canada released its first ever judgment involving the review of a decision by the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (the PMRA), allowing the judicial review appeal, returning the issue to the...more

63 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide