News & Analysis as of

Financial Services Industry › Injury-in-Fact › Putative Class Actions

Troutman Pepper

Third Circuit Holds “Confusion, Without More” Is Not Enough to Confer Standing Under the FDCPA

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recently underscored the fact that a plaintiff does not automatically gain Article III standing under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) simply because they are...more

Troutman Pepper

Citing Recent Precedent, Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Lacks Standing Based on Informational Injury Doctrine in FDCPA Class Action

Troutman Pepper on

On November 22, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision finding that the plaintiff lacked Article III standing in a putative class action brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)....more

Troutman Pepper

For Your Information: Third Circuit Rejects Article III Standing Based on Informational Injury Doctrine in FDCPA Class Action

Troutman Pepper on

On October 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision rejecting a district court’s finding that the so-called informational injury doctrine established Article III standing for the named plaintiff...more

Burr & Forman

Seventh Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Claim for Lack of Standing

Burr & Forman on

In Pierre v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., — F.4th —, 2022 WL 986441 (7th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022), the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), finding that the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

4th Circuit Rules Plaintiffs Have No Standing to Sue Based on Mere RESPA Statutory Violation Claim

Ballard Spahr LLP on

A three judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit) recently held in Baehrs v. The Creig Northrop Team et al that although the plaintiffs had alleged a violation of the Real Estate...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Eighth Circuit Rules Against Telemarketing Company on TCPA Claim, Yet Declares $1.6 Billion in Statutory Damages Unconstitutional

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit found that unwanted, prerecorded phone messages to consumers, even without any other alleged harm, met the injury-in-fact requirement for Article III standing to bring a...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide