News & Analysis as of

Financial Services Industry Securities Violations Supreme Court of the United States

Mayer Brown

U.S. Supreme Court Distinguishes Half-Truths from Pure Omissions and Holds That Pure Omissions Are Not Actionable Under Rule...

Mayer Brown on

Answering a precise question increasingly raised by securities fraud plaintiffs, the United States Supreme Court held in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners that a failure to disclose information cannot support a...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

SCOTUS Unanimously Resolves Securities Fraud Circuit Split

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On April 12, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that, in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement, a failure to disclose information required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K (“Item 303”) does not support a...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

U.S. Supreme Court: "Pure" Omissions Are Not Actionable Under Rule 10b-5

Amundsen Davis LLC on

On April 12, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. et al v. Moab Partners, L.P., et al. which held that omissions, by themselves, are not subject to private rights...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

SCOTUS Limits Certain 10(b) Claims Based on Violations of Item 303

In a unanimous decision issued on Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a corporation’s failure to disclose information regarding known trends or uncertainties, required by SEC regulation, cannot be the basis for private...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Supreme Court Underscores Limited Applicability of Rule 10b-5(b) Omissions Claims

Epstein Becker & Green on

In Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., No. 22-1165, 601 U.S. ___ (April 12, 2024), the United States Supreme Court held that “pure omissions are not actionable” for securities fraud asserted specifically...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Financial Daily Dose 10.25.2019 | Top Story: ECB Holds Rates Steady as Draghi Departs

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Mario Draghi presided over his final ECB meeting yesterday, with the central bank deciding to hold rates steady and let current stimulus measures play out for the time being. His departure (and the arrival of former IMF chief...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Your Daily Dose of Financial News

Robins Kaplan LLP on

The world’s keeping a wary eye on Turkey’s economic well-being, especially given the precipitous drop in the value of the country’s currency (which has pushed up prices for consumers and corporations) and President Erdogan’s...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Deals Blow to SEC By Applying Five-Year Statute of Limitations to Disgorgement Remedies in SEC Enforcement Actions

On June 5, 2017 the Supreme Court dealt a significant setback to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) by limiting its power to extract ill-gotten profits from securities laws violators....more

King & Spalding

Reflections on Kokesh v. SEC: Potential Ramifications of SEC Disgorgement Being a Penalty

King & Spalding on

In the week since the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Kokesh v. SEC, which rejected the Securities and Exchange Commission’s longstanding position that disgorgement was an equitable remedy not subject to the five-year...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

SEC’s Negotiating Power Curbed - U.S. Supreme Court holds disgorgement subject to a five-year statute of limitations

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split among the Tenth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals by holding that because disgorgement in a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

In Two Unanimous Rulings, U.S. Supreme Court Limits Penalties in SEC Enforcement and Criminal Actions

In a pair of decisions issued on June 5, the Supreme Court sharply curtailed the scope of financial sanctions available in civil securities enforcement and criminal drug trafficking cases. In addition to the results, which...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Provides New Leverage for Defendants in SEC Enforcement Actions

Troutman Pepper on

For many years, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sought both civil monetary penalties and disgorgement of unlawful gains from those alleged to have violated federal securities laws. While civil monetary...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Limits SEC Disgorgement Orders With Five-Year Statute of Limitations

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: On June 5, 2017, the United States Supreme Court resolved a split among the federal circuit courts by unanimously holding that disgorgement collected by the Securities and Exchange Commission is subject to...more

Hogan Lovells

Supreme Court Limits SEC Disgorgement Orders to a Five-Year Statute of Limitations

Hogan Lovells on

Recently, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Kokesh v. SEC that disgorgement orders in enforcement actions by the Securities and Exchange Commission are subject to the same five-year statute of limitations as monetary...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Decision Provides Significant Protection to Securities Industry, Limits SEC Enforcement

In a decision previewed in an earlier post, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission that the five-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. section 2462 applies to SEC...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide