News & Analysis as of

First Amendment › Petition for Writ of Certiorari › Supreme Court of the United States

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech... more +
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech or the press, preventing citizens from peacefully assembling, or interfering with citizens' ability to petition the government for redress of their grievances. The First Amendment is one of the most sacred aspects of the American legal tradition and has spawned a vast body of jurisprudence and commentary. less -
Troutman Pepper

Industry Urges SCOTUS to Consider FDA Graphic Cigarette Warnings

Troutman Pepper on

In August, a group of tobacco companies filed a petition for certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of a lower court’s holding that the First Amendment does not prohibit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...more

Saiber LLC

The NetChoice Social Media Cases: Back to the Beginning

Saiber LLC on

​​​​​​​In a past Trending Law Blog post on November 1, 2023, we discussed how the Supreme Court of the United States granted petitions for certiorari in Florida’s NetChoice LLC v. Moody case and Texas’ NetChoice LLC v. Paxton...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Anti-Social Media Behavior, Free Speech and Governmental Liability: I – Lindke v. Freed

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

In April 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to a pair of cases dealing with the intersection of free speech, social media, and governmental liability.  Both cases deal with § 1983 actions against governmental...more

McDermott Will & Emery

2023 IP Outlook: Trademark and Copyright Supreme Court Update

McDermott Will & Emery on

Three interesting intellectual property cases are on the Supreme Court of the United States’ docket in 2023. The Supreme Court’s opinions in these cases could have significant implications for trademark and copyright disputes...more

Miller Nash LLP

Second Time Lucky? Supreme Court Grants Cert in Jack Daniel’s Dog Toy Case

Miller Nash LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to Jack Daniel’s distillery in its appeal of a Ninth Circuit decision holding that a dog toy manufacturer’s use of the Jack Daniel’s trademarks and label design is...more

Jackson Walker

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms First Amendment Protection of Elected Bodies to Censure Members

Jackson Walker on

On March 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court decided Houston Community College System v. Wilson, holding that an elected official does not possess an actionable First Amendment retaliation claim arising from a purely...more

Sullivan & Worcester

Art Dealer and Holocaust Claimant Asks Supreme Court to Hear Dispute Over Poland’s Vendetta Against Him

Sullivan & Worcester on

We were privileged to file today a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of our client, art dealer Alexander Khochinsky. The petition asks the Court for reinstatement of a lawsuit...more

Franczek P.C.

Supreme Court (Finally) Will Address School Discipline for Off-Campus, Online Student Speech

Franczek P.C. on

In 2017, a high school cheerleader learned she had not made the varsity team and turned to Snapchat. She posted a picture of herself and a friend, middle fingers up, with the text “f— school f— softball f— cheer f—...more

BCLP

SCOTUS Upholds TCPA but Strikes Government Debt Collection Exception

BCLP on

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") has been the subject of significant class and consumer litigation risk exposure for many industries, including financial institutions. In a July 6 ruling, the United States...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Strikes Down Government-Backed Debt Exception; TCPA Stands

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Earlier today the Supreme Court released its decision in Barr v. Political Consultants, a case which attempted to end the TCPA as we know it.  Instead, the Court struck down a narrow exception to the TCPA, known as the...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Supreme Court leaves TCPA intact; strikes down exception for government debt collection

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) remains in place, but the exception permitting robocalls for government debt collection has fallen, in a decision by the US Supreme Court addressing the constitutionality of the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

To Sever or Not to Sever: Supreme Court Grapples With Political Consultants’ First Amendment TCPA Challenge

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: On May 6, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a First Amendment challenge to a 2015 amendment to the TCPA, which exempted calls regarding debts owed to the government from certain of its...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Debates Whether to Flush TCPA’s Autodialer Restriction During Barr v. AAPC Oral Argument

Womble Bond Dickinson on

It seems that the oral argument in Barr, Attorney General v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. may become better known for the toilet flush that could be heard in the course of the argument, rather than the...more

Burr & Forman

Duran v. La Boom Disco: It Is Time For SCOTUS To Decide The ATDS Issue

Burr & Forman on

Those of us who have been litigating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) have spent the better part of the last decade trying to determine what constitutes an automated telephone dialing system (“ATDS”).  ...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Supreme Court To Decide Constitutionality of Government-Backed Debt Exception

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to weigh in on the constitutionality of the exception to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for government-backed debt, namely whether that exception violates the First Amendment...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari To Review Fourth Circuit’s TCPA Decision

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on

On January 10, 2020, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the Fourth Circuit’s decision to strike the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (TCPA) “government-debt exemption.” See Am. Ass’n of Political Consultants,...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Supreme Court Agrees to Review TCPA’s Constitutionality

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari to review whether a 2015 amendment to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violates the First Amendment and/or if it perhaps renders the statute unconstitutional as a...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court to Review the Constitutionality of the Government-Backed Debt Exception to the TCPA

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The TCPA is off to an exciting start this new year. On Friday, January 10, 2020, the Supreme Court granted the Petition for Certiorari filed in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc., to review the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS agrees to decide whether TCPA exception for calls to collect government debts violates First Amendment

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s exception from its automated call restriction for calls to collect government debts violates the First Amendment of the U.S....more

Goodwin

TCPA’s Constitutionality Under the First Amendment Poised For Supreme Court Intervention

Goodwin on

On December 2, 2019, the United States government submitted a brief to the Supreme Court urging it to deny review of a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling holding a provision of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

MarkIt to Market - February 2019: Trademark Practice Update: Outrageous! Disgraceful! Appalling!...or is it? SCOTUS to Decide the...

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

U.S. trademark attorneys received a New Year’s surprise last month when the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear Iancu v. Brunetti, the case that should determine the availability of federal trademark...more

Cohen & Gresser LLP

How an Uncommonly Silly Law Led to a Host of Very Consequential Supreme Court Decisions

Cohen & Gresser LLP on

In 1879, Connecticut passed a law barring the use of “any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception”; the penalty was“not less than fifty dollars” or between 60 days and one year in...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Intellectual Property Bulletin - Winter 2017

Fenwick & West LLP on

A Smooth Patch in a Rough Road? Governmental Transition and Intellectual Property - Whenever a new Congress convenes, some IP issues come to the fore while others take a back seat. Transition to a new administration in the...more

WilmerHale

Copyright and Trademark Case Review: The Slants, The Sims and SCAR Rifles

WilmerHale on

Supreme Court Agrees to Review Bar on Registration of Disparaging Marks, Denies Washington Redskins' Petition to Join Proceedings - Supreme Court Agrees to Review Bar on Registration of Disparaging Marks, Denies...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Watching SCOTUS – ERISA Church-Plan Exemption Revisited

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Currently before the Supreme Court are two petitions regarding the thorny legal question of which organizations can qualify for ERISA’s Church-plan exemption. If the Supreme Court grants certiorari and...more

34 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide