News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Franchisors

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Salon Franchisee Snipped, Confirmed, and Enjoined

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Tennessee granted a motion for a default judgment in the franchisor’s favor against its former franchisee requiring the franchisee to pay damages and comply with the post-termination obligations...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Too Much Control can be Painful

Lewitt Hackman on

An employee of a Domino’s Pizza franchisee, returning from a pizza delivery, collided with a motorcyclist who suffered serious injuries. After a Pennsylvania jury found Domino’s (as franchisor) vicariously liable for the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Clear Terms of Franchise Agreement Are Enforced Against Franchisee

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A recent federal court decision in T&T Management, Inc. v. Choice Hotels, Inc. underscores key contractual and operational considerations for franchisors. T&T filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Franchise Agreement Precludes Defend Trade Secrets Act Claim

On February 27, 2025, the District of Minnesota granted a franchisor’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit initiated by its franchisee, alleging, among other things, breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets under the...more

Lathrop GPM

Pennsylvania Appellate Court Affirms Finding of Vicarious Liability Against Franchisor in Pizza Delivery Accident

Lathrop GPM on

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently affirmed a judgment holding Domino’s Pizza vicariously liable for a motorcycle accident involving a franchisee’s delivery driver. Coryell v. Morris, — A.3d —, 2025 Pa. Super. 28...more

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Grants Remediation Franchisor’s Motion to Stay Proceedings

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently granted Ringside Development Company’s motion to stay a franchisee-initiated lawsuit pending resolution through alternative dispute resolution. Jameson v. Ringside Development Company,...more

Polsinelli

California Enacts New Franchise Broker Law

Polsinelli on

On Sept. 24, 2024, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 919, the California Franchise Broker Law, into law. Officially titled the “Franchise Investment Law: Franchise Brokers,” the California Franchise Broker Law...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: The Forwarded Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

A district court in Arizona granted a franchisor’s motion to transfer venue to Missouri pursuant to the terms of the franchise agreement. S&G Elite LLC (“S&G”) and ST National Franchising, LLC (“Franchisor”) entered into a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Guidance for Franchisors: Lessons from N.A.R., Inc. v. Eastern Outdoor Furnishings

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A recent New Jersey appellate court decision provides valuable guidance for franchisors and their in-house legal teams on structuring and protecting franchise relationships. The court affirmed that a terminated retailer of...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

IFA Takeaways: How Smart Franchisors Stay Out of Court

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The International Franchise Association’s Annual Convention is always filled with useful take home information for franchise practitioners. Last week, I attended the session “Proactive Strategies for Franchisors to Prevent...more

Lathrop GPM

New Jersey Appellate Court Confirms Terminated Retailer Is Not in a Franchise Relationship with Manufacturer

Lathrop GPM on

A New Jersey appellate court affirmed a state trial court’s ruling that a terminated retailer of custom outdoor kitchens was not in a franchise relationship with a manufacturer of outdoor grills and that the New Jersey...more

Polsinelli

Global Franchise & Supply Network - 2025 Report

Polsinelli on

While 2024 saw more stability in the financial markets than 2023, many challenges arose in 2024 for franchised businesses, manufacturers and retail chains, including bankruptcies of many large restaurant and retail chains,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Navigating Non-Compete Agreements: Key Considerations for In-House Counsel in Franchise Businesses

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In May of last year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought to ban non-compete agreements in most employment contracts. Franchise agreements were an exception. However, before the rule could take effect in September, a...more

Lewitt Hackman

NASAA Guidance for Franchise Non-Competes

Lewitt Hackman on

Last May, the Federal Trade Commission looked to ban non-compete agreements in most employment contracts aside from franchise agreements. Although scheduled to become effective in September, a federal court vacated the ruling...more

K&L Gates LLP

New Franchising Code to Commence in April

K&L Gates LLP on

The Competition and Consumer (Industry Code–Franchising) Regulations 2024 (Cth) (the New Code Draft), which replaces the Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes—Franchising) Regulation 2014 (the Old Code), is now in force...more

Offit Kurman

Virginia Bill That Would Ban Franchise Non-Competes Advances in State Senate

Offit Kurman on

Virginia Senate Bill 798, introduced by former in-home senior care franchisee Sen. Chris Head, was passed unanimously by the Virginia Senate on January 17, 2025. The bill would amend Virginia's Retail Franchising Law to...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Detailing Within a State Addendum

Lewitt Hackman on

A California federal court partially granted a motion to compel arbitration by car care franchisor Spiffy Franchising. However, the court invalidated provisions in the franchise agreement providing for dispute resolution in...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

FDD Update Season: Is it time to call your Franchise Litigator?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

January officially starts the “Franchise Disclosure Document (“FDD”) Update Season”. And for franchise lawyers that focus on representing franchisors in the development of FDDs and related tasks, it is arguably the most...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Something in the Water

Lewitt Hackman on

A Mississippi federal court granted summary judgment in favor of Leisure Systems, Inc. (“LSI”), a franchisor of Yogi Bear themed children’s parks and campgrounds, on negligence and premises liability claims. The case was...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Should the Litigation be in State or Federal Court?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Deciding whether to choose state or federal court can be outcome determinative. This is particularly important in deciding to remove a case from state to federal court. Some state franchise statutes clearly allow a court to...more

Lathrop GPM

Ohio Federal Court Rejects Hotel Franchisors’ Pursuit of Indemnification Under Federal Trafficking Statute but Permits State Law...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Ohio recently narrowed two hotel franchisors’ attempt to implead their franchisee in a lawsuit under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). A.S. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., 2024 WL...more

Lathrop GPM

Washington Court Grants Summary Judgment Against Attorney General and Awards Fees to Franchisor

Lathrop GPM on

A state court in Washington has granted summary judgment and awarded over $3.4 million in attorneys’ fees and costs to a franchisor in a dispute brought by the Washington Attorney General under the Washington’s Consumer...more

Lathrop GPM

Franchisor Not Liable for Alleged Customer Injuries at Franchised Water Park

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Mississippi granted summary judgment in favor of a franchisor on negligence claims that arose after eleven children allegedly contracted E. coli in a franchised water park’s pool. Neely v. Great Escapes...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Convenient Franchise Practices

Lewitt Hackman on

A New Jersey federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of 7-Eleven, Inc. in a dispute with a franchisee. The franchisee signed a franchise agreement to operate a 7-Eleven store in Princeton, New Jersey,...more

Allen Matkins

What Is A Franchise?

Allen Matkins on

If you ask for a definition of "franchise" in California law, there are at least three answers.  Two are statutory and one is judicial.  Corporations Code Section 31005 defines "franchise" for purposes of California's...more

372 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 15

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide