News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Irreparable Harm

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Braking The Competing Business

Lewitt Hackman on

A Massachusetts federal district court enforced a non-compete provision in a franchise agreement to enjoin former franchisees from operating a different branded automotive business at the same location as the former...more

Lathrop GPM

Arizona Federal Court Grants Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Against Former Franchisee for Violation of...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Arizona recently granted franchisor LeTip World Franchise’s motion to temporarily restrain and preliminarily enjoin a former franchisee from operating a competing business. LeTip World Franchise, LLC v....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: An UnBakeable Non-Compete

Lewitt Hackman on

A Minnesota federal court denied cookie dough franchisor Cookie Dough Bliss Franchising’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against a former Minnesota franchisee and its owners....more

Lathrop GPM

Utah Federal Court Denies Franchisor’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Competitor

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Utah denied a requested injunction in a dispute between competitors in the gourmet cookie market. Crumbl LLC v. Dirty Dough LLC, (D. Utah Aug. 11, 2023)....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Court Taxes Franchisor’s Restrictive Covenants

Lewitt Hackman on

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s order denying a franchisor’s request for preliminary injunction against a terminated franchisee to enforce covenants not to compete or solicit former clients....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Court Hits Brakes on Former Franchisees

Lewitt Hackman on

An Ohio appellate court upheld the state trial court’s decision to grant a permanent injunction against two former franchisees of an auto body shop franchise working for a competitor in violation of the franchise agreement’s...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: No Repairing Delayed Filing

Lewitt Hackman on

A New Jersey federal court denied a franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction against a franchisee due to franchisor’s 11 month delay in bringing the motion. Franchisee entered into two franchise agreements with H-1 Auto...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: The Small Business on Main Street

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court denied a motion for preliminary injunction brought by pizza franchisor, Breadeaux’s Pisa, LLC, seeking to stop a former franchisee from operating a competing pizza business. The franchise agreement...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Franchisor’s Tough Mountain to Climb for TRO

Lewitt Hackman on

A California federal court denied Mountain Mike’s Pizza a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against one of its franchisees who did not renew its franchise agreement and opened a new restaurant under a different name. In...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: No Shaking Franchisor’s TRO

Lewitt Hackman on

An Indiana federal court granted hamburger and milkshake franchisor, Steak n Shake, a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against a franchisee to enforce post-termination obligations under franchise and area development...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Bad to the Bone

Lewitt Hackman on

A group of franchisees sued OsteoStrong, a franchisor of bone density improvement centers. They claimed omissions in the FDD about bankruptcies and lawsuits, and misrepresentations of patent rights to equipment and...more

Bennett Jones LLP

A Clarified Approach to Pure Economic Loss Claims

Bennett Jones LLP on

In November 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in 1688782 Ontario Inc. v Maple Leaf Foods Inc. This is an important decision clarifying the analytical approach to the duty of care analysis in negligence...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Not at Liberty to Compete

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Michigan granted a preliminary injunction in favor of tax preparation franchisor, Liberty Tax Service (JTH Tax, Inc. v. Magnotte, E.D. Mich., ¶16,575), finding it was likely to succeed on its...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Enjoined in Margaritaville

Lewitt Hackman on

Eskimo Hut, a franchisor of convenience stores that sell frozen daiquiris-to-go, convinced a Texas appellate court that it would probably win on claims that South Plains, a franchisee using a nonconforming drink mix, breached...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: What to Do About Franchisor’s Harmful New Policies

Lewitt Hackman on

Franchisees aren't always excited when their franchisor introduces a new policy. But if a new policy overreaches and might doom a franchisee's business, can it be stopped before it starts?...more

Burns & Levinson LLP

Don’t Overlook The Need to Show Irreparable Harm When Seeking Injunctive Relief to Enforce a Non-Compete

Burns & Levinson LLP on

When seeking preliminary injunctive relief to enforce a non-compete, the moving party is often focused on how obvious it is that the defendant breached the parties’ agreement. As 7-Eleven recently learned, however, even when...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide