News & Analysis as of

Franchise Termination Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Extra Cheesed Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Texas denied a preliminary injunction filed by a franchisee (“EYM”) after Pizza Hut, as franchisor, terminated the franchise agreements....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: An UnBakeable Non-Compete

Lewitt Hackman on

A Minnesota federal court denied cookie dough franchisor Cookie Dough Bliss Franchising’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against a former Minnesota franchisee and its owners....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Blown Dry by the Competition

Lewitt Hackman on

A Minnesota bankruptcy court granted Fantastic Sams a preliminary injunction against a former Fantastic Sams franchisee, finding the operation of four new hair salons by the former franchisee was prohibited by enforceable...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: No Shaking Franchisor’s TRO

Lewitt Hackman on

An Indiana federal court granted hamburger and milkshake franchisor, Steak n Shake, a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against a franchisee to enforce post-termination obligations under franchise and area development...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Fitness Franchisee Exercises Poor Judgment

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Denver granted Fitness Together Franchise, LLC a preliminary injunction against the owner of three former franchisees, three former franchisee entities and three additional entities formed to operate a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: COVID Defense Leads to Contempt

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Tennessee held a Gus’s World Famous Fried Chicken former franchisee in contempt for failure to deidentify its restaurant after entry of a temporary restraining order and consent to a permanent injunction. ...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: (Non)Competing for Care

Lewitt Hackman on

A U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a federal district court decision partly granting a preliminary injunction sought by a companionship and domestic care services franchisor against a former franchisee, for violating the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Successor Slips Out of Non-Compete

Lewitt Hackman on

A Florida federal court granted a preliminary injunction against a terminated franchisee. The court enjoined the ex-franchisee from using the franchisor’s trademarks and trade dress. The court enforced the franchisor’s...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchise 101: A Sticky Situation

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Maryland entered default judgment and a permanent injunction in favor of an ice cream franchisor against a franchisee that continued operating its ice cream shop after termination....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Romaine Rejection

Lewitt Hackman on

Many will recall the 2018 national outbreak of E. coli bacteria linked to romaine lettuce. In April that year, an Ohio franchisor ordered its restaurants to stop serving romaine lettuce and dispose of any remaining romaine...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: If it Walks Like a Franchise, Talks Like a Franchise, it Might Be a Franchise

Lewitt Hackman on

Twin City Lodging LLC bought a Best Western Hotel in Mankato, Minnesota, then entered into a “Membership Agreement” with Best Western International. Best Western granted Twin City a license to operate the hotel under Best...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Injunction A-Berted

Lewitt Hackman on

Sandwich shop franchisor Erbert and Gerbert (“E&G”) was unable to demonstrate a “better than negligible” likelihood of succeeding on allegations that a former franchisee infringed its trade dress in establishing a new...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide