News & Analysis as of

Franchisee Forum Selection Franchisors

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Grants Remediation Franchisor’s Motion to Stay Proceedings

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently granted Ringside Development Company’s motion to stay a franchisee-initiated lawsuit pending resolution through alternative dispute resolution. Jameson v. Ringside Development Company,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: The Forwarded Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

A district court in Arizona granted a franchisor’s motion to transfer venue to Missouri pursuant to the terms of the franchise agreement. S&G Elite LLC (“S&G”) and ST National Franchising, LLC (“Franchisor”) entered into a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Detailing Within a State Addendum

Lewitt Hackman on

A California federal court partially granted a motion to compel arbitration by car care franchisor Spiffy Franchising. However, the court invalidated provisions in the franchise agreement providing for dispute resolution in...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Should the Litigation be in State or Federal Court?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Deciding whether to choose state or federal court can be outcome determinative. This is particularly important in deciding to remove a case from state to federal court. Some state franchise statutes clearly allow a court to...more

Lathrop GPM

Virginia Federal District Court Grants Motion to Transfer Pursuant to Forum Selection Clause Notwithstanding Virginia Retail...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Virginia recently granted a motion brought by equipment suppliers DET Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC and Synergy Catalyst, LLC, together doing business as “Recore,” to enforce a forum selection clause...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Leaky Forum Selection for Roofing Franchisor

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Indiana held that a forum selection clause in the franchise agreement prevailed over a competing forum selection clause in the personal guaranty....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Forum Selection Clause is Just what the Doctor Ordered

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal appellate court held that a forum selection clause requiring litigation to be in the jurisdiction where the franchisor’s principal place of business was located when the action was brought is enforceable. A...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Don’t Mess With Forum Selection Clauses

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in California granted a franchisor’s motion to transfer venue of claims brought by non-California franchisees to Texas. The ruling was based on a forum selection clause in the franchise agreements....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Inhospitable Forum Selection Clause

Lewitt Hackman on

A hotel franchisee brought a class action lawsuit in Louisiana federal court on behalf of Louisiana franchisees. The franchisor moved to transfer the action to Georgia, based on the mandatory forum selection clause in the...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #271

Lathrop GPM on

Ninth Circuit Reverses Class Action Settlement Approval and Fee Award - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed the approval of a $10 million voucher settlement and a $2.6 million attorneys’ fee award in a class...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #269

Lathrop GPM on

Two Illinois Federal Courts Deny Class Certification in Anti-Poaching Class Actions Against Franchisors - Two federal courts in Illinois have rejected motions to certify classes of employees who worked in franchised...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 266

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Below are summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors. Post-Termination Injunction: Noncompete Covenants - California Federal Court Enforces...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 259

Lathrop GPM on

Colorado Federal Court Applies Forum Selection Clause to Non-Signatory Entities Controlled by Former Franchisees - A federal court in Colorado held that entities controlled by former franchisees were bound by the forum...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 254

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM, formerly known as The GPMemorandum. Below are summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors. Given the widespread and evolving impact of the COVID-19...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue 251

Lathrop GPM on

Court Dismisses Ostensible Agency Claim on Motion for Reconsideration - A federal court in California has granted a motion for reconsideration in light of recent Ninth Circuit precedent, reversing the district court’s...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: The Wrong Tools to Avoid California Courts

Lewitt Hackman on

The Ninth Circuit ruled that a California Matco Tool franchisee, John Fleming, could bring a class action wage and hour suit in California, even though a forum selection clause in the distribution agreement specified Ohio...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Forum Selection Clause Gone Wrong

Lewitt Hackman on

A California Court of Appeal held that courts should not enforce forum selection clauses in contracts that also contain a jury waiver. For franchisors that have California franchisees, this ruling could complicate the ability...more

Baker Donelson

Arkansas Loves Home Cookin'

Baker Donelson on

A federal judge in the Western District of Arkansas recently rejected a franchisor's attempt to invoke a forum selection clause, in Rob & Bud's Pizza, LLC v. Papa Murphy's Int'l, Inc,, on public policy grounds rooted in a...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide