News & Analysis as of

Franchises Dismissals Franchise Agreements

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Dismisses Discrimination and Tortious Interference Claims Brought Against Car Manufacturer and Its...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California granted two motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim in an action asserting discrimination and tortious interference claims against Volvo Car USA and its franchisee Haron Motor Sales, Inc....more

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Grants Retail Franchisor’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismisses Action

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently granted a motion brought by a franchisor and two of its employees to compel arbitration and dismiss an action alleging violations of the California Franchise Investment Law, breach of...more

Lathrop GPM

Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Franchisor's Trade Secret Claim for Failure to Plead with Specificity

Lathrop GPM on

A Virginia federal court recently granted a motion to dismiss all six counts of a franchisor's complaint against a competing former franchisee for failure to plead with specificity under the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016...more

Lathrop GPM

Seventh Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Anti-Poaching Class Action Against McDonald’s

Lathrop GPM on

In an important case of first impression that drew amicus participation from the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the International Franchise Association, the Seventh Circuit reversed a judgment in...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: A Broad Brush Addendum

Lewitt Hackman on

A Virginia district court dismissed a lawsuit filed by 360 Painting, a franchisor of residential and commercial painting services, concluding an addendum to the parties’ franchise agreement precluded 360 Painting’s claims for...more

Lathrop GPM

Maine Federal Court Grants Franchisor’s Motion to Dismiss Age Discrimination Claim Brought by Franchisee’s Independent Contractor

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Maine granted a franchisor’s motion to dismiss claims asserting that a franchisor was liable for its franchisee’s alleged age discrimination in employment. Goodwill v. Anywhere Real Est., 2023 WL 4034372...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Court Looks at What a Franchise Is Under the Minnesota Franchise Act

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Louis Degidio, Inc. v. Industrial Combustion, LLC, Louis Degidio, Inc. (Degidio) and Louis Degidio Services, Inc. (Degidio Services) sued Industrial Combustion, LLC (IC), a manufacturer of “institutional boiler system”...more

Lathrop GPM

Florida Federal Court Dismisses Matter Sua Sponte Pursuant to Forum-Selection Clause in the Franchise Agreement

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Florida recently dismissed a franchisee’s lawsuit sua sponte pursuant to the forum-selection clause in the parties’ franchise agreements, finding the clause valid, mandatory, and enforceable. Kava Culture...more

Lathrop GPM

Michigan Federal Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Michigan granted a motion to dismiss claims that franchisor Bateel International, LLC had violated the Michigan Franchise Investment Law and the Texas Business Opportunity Act. Luxury Concepts, Inc. v....more

Lathrop GPM

Maryland Federal Court Denies Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens but Grant’s Franchisee’s Motion to Dismiss for Personal...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Maryland granted a foreign hotel franchisee’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction but denied a forum non conveniens motion in a personal injury case naming both franchisor and franchisee as...more

Lathrop GPM

New Jersey Federal District Court Denies Franchisee’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Grants Franchisor’s Motion to Dismiss

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in New Jersey has denied a motion to compel arbitration in a dispute over alleged breach of a franchise agreement. Passion for Restaurants, Inc. v. Villa Pizza, LLC, 2022 WL 18024209 (D.N.J. Dec. 30, 2022)....more

Lathrop GPM

Louisiana Appeals Court Affirms Dismissal of Vicarious Liability Claim

Lathrop GPM on

An appellate court in Louisiana recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of a franchisor, dismissing negligence and premises liability claims asserted by a customer was injured on unauthorized exercise equipment. Flynn v....more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Eleventh Circuit Serves a Whopper of a Ruling on Franchisor’s ‘No-Poach’/‘No-Hire’ Agreement With Franchisees

​​​​​​​Over the last several years, business-to-business “no-hire” and “no-poach” agreements have come under legal attack, including through enforcement actions by the Federal Trade Commission and criminal prosecutions by the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Jani-King Franchisees Wear Many Crowns

Lewitt Hackman on

Past and present franchisees of commercial cleaning service franchisor, Jani-King, brought claims for violation of Connecticut minimum wage and anti-kickback laws, and unjust enrichment. They claimed Jani-King misclassified...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 266

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Below are summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors. Post-Termination Injunction: Noncompete Covenants - California Federal Court Enforces...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 260

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM, formerly known as The GPMemorandum. Periodically, The Franchise Memorandum focuses on topics primarily of interest to companies that use distributors and dealers rather than...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Expo is No Excuse

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Missouri ruled that a franchisee’s fraud claim cannot be based on the franchisor’s prediction at a franchise expo of future success in the franchised business....more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Bar-B-Q Blues — A Tale of Friendship, Partnership, and Deceit

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal appeals court reversed dismissal of a claim against a barbeque restaurant franchisor. The court found that, despite having signed releases in favor of the franchisor, a former franchisee had valid claims for...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Finger Lickin’ Restrictions

Lewitt Hackman on

Franchise agreements give franchisors nearly absolute, unfettered discretion to control advertising of their brands. Franchisors need not regard prior course of dealings with franchisees. An Illinois federal court dismissed a...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide