News & Analysis as of

Franchises Independent Contractors Wage and Hour

Lathrop GPM

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rules that Franchisees Did Not Perform Services for Franchisor Within the Meaning of the...

Lathrop GPM on

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court answered “no” to a certified question from the First Circuit Court of Appeals asking whether plaintiff franchisees “‘perform any service’ for 7-Eleven within the meaning of [the...more

Locke Lord LLP

Can Nurses Lawfully Be Classified as Independent Contractors? September 2024 IC Legal ‎News Update

Locke Lord LLP on

One of the most important legal developments last month is a new lawsuit filed by registered nurses against a leading health care system alleging that they have been misclassified as independent contractors instead of...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Oh, thank heaven! 7-Eleven franchisees were not misclassified “employees,” MA high court rules

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, answering a certified question, has ruled that five 7-Eleven franchisees were independent contractors, not misclassified “employees,” under the Massachusetts Independent Contractor...more

McCarter & English, LLP

NLRB Establishes New Joint Employer Rule

McCarter & English, LLP on

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) governs private sector labor/management relations in the United States. Under the NLRA, employers have certain responsibilities and restrictions with regard to their employees,...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

NLRB Wants Employers to be Responsible for Contract, Franchise Workers

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In the latest of a string of decisions seemingly supporting President Biden’s claim of being the most pro-union president in history, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) this week issued its Final Rule on the Standard...more

Lathrop GPM

First Circuit Certifies Second Employee Misclassification Question to Massachusetts Supreme Court in Ongoing 7-Eleven Case

Lathrop GPM on

The First Circuit Court of Appeals recently certified to the Massachusetts Supreme Court the question of whether franchisee plaintiffs in an ongoing case pass the threshold inquiry under the state’s three-prong employee...more

Lathrop GPM

Ninth Circuit Affirms Decision that Franchisees Are Not Employees of Franchisor

Lathrop GPM on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a decision that a group of franchisees are not employees of their franchisor, even though the trial court failed to apply the correct test. Haitayan v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2022...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

Local and State Employment Law Update: Sex Harassment and Discrimination, Salary Disclosure and Equal Pay

Amundsen Davis LLC on

ARIZONA- Pursuant to H.B. 2146, employers must notify the Arizona Department of Homeland Security about any security breach involving personal information, if more than 1,000 state residents (including employees and...more

Morgan Lewis

Massachusetts High Court Issues Three Major Wage and Hour Decisions

Morgan Lewis on

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently issued three decisions with significant implications for employers in the commonwealth, holding that (1) when an employer pays wages to an employee after the deadlines...more

Littler

Massachusetts Top Court Issues Key Ruling Impacting Independent Contractors

Littler on

On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) handed down a key ruling that could have a significant impact on franchising across the state. In Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., the SJC was asked whether the...more

Fisher Phillips

Massachusetts Franchise Owner-Operators May Be Employees of Franchisors

Fisher Phillips on

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court just held that 7-Eleven franchisees may be employees of 7-Eleven under Massachusetts wage and hour law. The March 24 decision in Dhananjay Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc. will have significant...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Jani-King Franchisees Wear Many Crowns

Lewitt Hackman on

Past and present franchisees of commercial cleaning service franchisor, Jani-King, brought claims for violation of Connecticut minimum wage and anti-kickback laws, and unjust enrichment. They claimed Jani-King misclassified...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Franchising Threat No. 3: Other State Legislation And Policies

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The California version of the ABC test is arguably the most hostile to franchising. Nonetheless, the risk is not confined to California. This is because the ABC employee classification test, with variations, has been...more

Roetzel & Andress

Department Of Labor Planning Enhanced Enforcement

Roetzel & Andress on

Not surprisingly, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division is looking to reverse many of the Trump administration’s employer-friendly initiatives and rules. Those reversals include: •Setting aside...more

Polsinelli

Evolving Worker Classification Standards and the Future of Franchising

Polsinelli on

From a ballot measure in California, to a court decision in Massachusetts, to federal regulations proposed by the Department of Labor, several recent developments could impact whether a franchisor’s independent franchisees...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Best in Law: AB5 and Franchisees

BB&K Partner Thomas O'Connell Explores the Independent Contractor Law's Impact on the Franchise Industry in a Southern California Newspaper Group Column - In enacting Assembly Bill 5 earlier this year, the California...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Seyfarth Policy Matters Newsletter - February 2020 #3

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

NLRB Issues Final Joint Employer Rule. On February 26, the NLRB published its final rule governing joint employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. ...more

Littler

New Jersey Enacts Legislative Package to Add Teeth to Worker Misclassification Laws

Littler on

Seeking to tighten worker misclassification enforcement in New Jersey, on January 20, 2020, Governor Phil Murphy signed into law a package of legislation to add misclassification penalties, allow stop-work orders against...more

Littler

Plaintiffs’ Bar Seeks to Expand Reach of California’s Dynamex Decision and ABC Test to Franchising, Joint Employment

Littler on

The battle over the scope and applicability of the so-called “ABC test” in determining California employers’ potential liability under wage and hour and other state labor laws continues unabated....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Time To Exhale . . . CAUTIOUSLY: Ninth Circuit Has Good News For Franchisors

Fox Rothschild LLP on

I admit I was among the scores of franchise lawyers whose blood pressure skyrocketed with passage of California’s AB 5. If a Franchise Agreement establishes an independent contractor relationship between franchisor and...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

New California Law Imperils Franchise Model

Fox Rothschild LLP on

“Someday, California is going to disappear into the ocean.” That phrase usually refers to the San Andreas Fault. But for those in the franchise industry, it may now refer to AB-5, a new California law that calls for...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 18, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new measure — Assembly Bill 5 — which will redefine how businesses classify their workers. Commonly known as “AB 5,” the new law seeks to codify the “ABC Test”...more

Littler

Highest Court in Canada Says Substance, not Form, will Determine Independent Contractor or Employee Status

Littler on

A recent Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decision considered whether a franchisee who entered into a franchise agreement with a franchisor was an employee or an independent contractor. The fact-specific case, Modern Cleaning...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Franchisor Can Be Liable as “Employer” for Missclassifying Workers

Lewitt Hackman on

The Ninth Circuit sent shockwaves through the franchise industry in ruling that last year’s California Supreme Court decision broadening who may bring wage misclassification claims (Dynamex v. Superior Court) applied...more

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

Ninth Circuit “Cleans House” in Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Decision by Holding ABC Test Applies Retroactively and Opining on Its Effect on...

On May 2, 2019, the Ninth Circuit in Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int’l, Inc. held that the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court applied retroactively. ...more

44 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide