News & Analysis as of

GEICO

McCarter & English, LLP

What Does the GEICO Decision Mean for New Jersey Providers?

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals held in a recent precedential case that the court must compel arbitration between Government Employees Insurance Company (Geico) and several medical practices, which Geico had sued for fraud...more

Melito & Adolfsen

Accidents, pain, lawsuits, doctors and lawyers. Is the pain real? The Nail Gun Story.

Melito & Adolfsen on

Anyone injured in an accident allegedly caused by the negligence of another can sue for pain caused by the injury. The increasing number of surgeries injuries from accidents is now a major focus of defendants and the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Motion to Strike Damages Expert Leads to Denial of Class Certification

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A recent decision denying class certification in the Northern District of Illinois highlights the importance for class action defendants of challenging a named plaintiff’s damages expert as part of a strategy for opposing...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Insurance Franchisor Cannot Mitigate Franchise Claims

Lewitt Hackman on

A Wisconsin federal district court allowed an insurance company’s field representative’s allegations that his representation agreement was an unregistered franchise to proceed beyond the pleading stage....more

Robinson+Cole Class Actions Insider

Class Action Fairness Act Pleading Requirements for Removal Addressed by Ninth Circuit

A recent Ninth Circuit decision highlights the importance of the defendant clearly pleading the basis for alleging the amount in controversy in a notice of removal under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). In this case,...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week At The Ninth: Removal Requirements

This week, the Court holds that it may sua sponte question the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) in a removed case where a defendant’s notice of removal alleged the...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Seifer v. Government Employees Insurance Company, decided by the First Circuit on May 13, 2022, raises an issue that could cause insurers to rethink how they handle claim investigations and pre-suit settlements. Seifer raises...more

ArentFox Schiff

Second Circuit Rules That the Filed-Rate Doctrine Bars the Recalculation of Approved Auto Insurance Rates

ArentFox Schiff on

On May 25, 2022, in Grossman v. GEICO Cas. Co. (No. 21-278), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of an attempted class action by two automobile policyholders alleging that GEICO...more

Cozen O'Connor

Eleventh Circuit (Florida): No Bad Faith for Investigating Claim

Cozen O'Connor on

On February 15, 2022, the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit upheld the Southern District of Florida’s summary judgment victory for GEICO, finding that no reasonable jury could conclude that GEICO had...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - February 2022

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Causation, an issue courts often wrestle with when deciding insurance coverage issues, lands the starring role in our February Insurance Update. •A county experienced higher costs due to the opioid crisis. Does its...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Privacy & Cybersecurity Update - October 2021

In this month’s edition of our Privacy & Cybersecurity Update, we examine the FTC’s changes to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s Safeguards Rule and the CFPB’s order requiring six tech companies to disclose information regarding...more

Troutman Pepper

JPML Articulates Limitations for Consolidation in Geico Data Breach Litigation

Troutman Pepper on

Despite overlap of alleged putative nationwide class definitions, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) denied Geico’s attempt to consolidate five class-action lawsuits arising from a data breach notification...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

Good Faith: Plaintiffs’ Complaints About Release Held Invalid

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether tendering a policy limits check on a liability policy with an overbroad release could constitute bad faith. In Pelaez v....more

White and Williams LLP

Middle District of Florida Court Rejects Claim that Negligence is Sufficient to Support a Finding of Bad Faith

White and Williams LLP on

In Florida, an insurer is required to “settle, if possible, where a reasonably prudent person, faced with the prospect of paying the total recovery, would do so[.]” Harvey v. GEICO General Insurance Company, 259 So.3d 1 (Fla....more

Rumberger | Kirk

11th Circuit Reaffirms Insurers Can Still Prevail as a Matter of Law in Post-Harvey v. Geico Landscape

Rumberger | Kirk on

On June 1, 2021, theEleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a summary judgment granted in favor of an insurer in a third party bad faith claim. The case, Eres v. Progressive American Insurance Company, Case No. 20-11006,...more

Cozen O'Connor

Lack of Notice No Excuse for Failure to Settle

Cozen O'Connor on

An insurer can no longer claim its lack of notice of a lawsuit against its insured excuses it for failing to settle the suit after the Georgia Supreme Court’s recent decision in GEICO Indemnity Co. v. Whiteside, Case No....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Federal Court’s Discovery Ruling Offers Lessons To Insurers Alleging Health Care Fraud Pursuant To Predetermined Protocol Theory

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Last month, in Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Cereceda, 2021 WL 148738 at *6-7 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2021) (“Cereceda”), the Southern District of Florida issued a discovery ruling that insurers should consider carefully...more

BakerHostetler

AD-ttorneys@law – November 2020 #2

BakerHostetler on

Eleventh Circuit Pries Apart Sticky Trade Dress Decision - Is Gorilla Glue throwing a monkey fit after J-B Weld’s loss is torn apart? Opposites Attract - If you’re an average, buy-it-when-you-need-it glue consumer, you’re...more

King & Spalding

Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Class Action Seeking Declaratory Relief Because Lead Plaintiff Lacks Standing

King & Spalding on

On April 19, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit threw out a putative class action seeking declaratory relief against GEICO, citing the lead plaintiff’s lack of standing. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision was based on the long-settled...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Regional Claim Supervisor Qualifies as “Managing Agent,” Supporting Award of Punitive Damages

In Mazik v. GEICO General Ins. Co. (No. B281372, filed 5/17/19), a California appeals court upheld a judgment and award of punitive damages for bad faith delay of an underinsured motorist claim, on the ground that a claim...more

Carlton Fields

When Evidentiary Error Matters: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Decision to Grant Retrial

Carlton Fields on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently closed the book on litigation in which GEICO had been involved since 2010, holding that the granting of a retrial—which resulted in a GEICO victory after an initial...more

Cozen O'Connor

The Florida Supreme Court Pushes Florida Bad Faith Standard Closer to Negligence in Harvey v. GEICO Decision

Cozen O'Connor on

The Florida Supreme Court recently decided Harvey v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., No. SC17-85, 2018 WL 4496566, at *1 (Fla. Sept. 20, 2018), an important case setting forth what many will try to argue has lessened the standard for...more

White and Williams LLP

A Divided Florida Supreme Court Drastically Expands Liability for Bad Faith Claims

White and Williams LLP on

In a highly anticipated decision, a sharply divided Florida Supreme Court reversed the decision of the state’s Fourth District Court of Appeal and reinstated a jury’s $9.2 million verdict against GEICO for the insurer’s...more

Maynard Nexsen

Insurers Take Heed: South Carolina Law Does Not Require Apportionment of Punitive Damages

Maynard Nexsen on

In a significant but not entirely novel ruling, the South Carolina Supreme Court recently held that South Carolina law does not require the pro rata apportionment of punitive damages between damages sustained for bodily...more

Carlton Fields

New York Federal Court Curbs 30(B)(6) Topics And Quashes Non-Party Seeking The Same Testimony

Carlton Fields on

Defendants wanted to examine GEICO’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness about GEICO’s special investigation unit practices, protocols and guidelines, as well as its resources and procedures devoted to claim verification and fraud...more

59 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide