News & Analysis as of

Generic Drugs Jurisdiction

Array

eDiscovery and ANDA Litigation: Unique Timelines, Processes, and Workflows

Array on

ANDA litigation is a high-stakes niche of pharmaceutical law that presents unique challenges not only for lawyers, but also for eDiscovery practitioners. Here’s why: under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Generic’s Conversion from Paragraph IV to Section viii Upends Subject Matter Jurisdiction on Declaratory Judgment Counterclaims

The District Court of Delaware dismissed a generic drug company’s declaratory judgment counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity, finding that the court no longer had subject matter jurisdiction after the generic...more

Smart & Biggar

2020 Mid-Year Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

In the first half of 2020, Rx IP Update reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. We review the following top developments...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - May 2018

Knobbe Martens on

Priority Claims Cannot Be Incorporated by Reference - In Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited, Appeal Nos. 2016-2707 and 2016-2708, the Federal Circuit held that when a patent for a...more

Knobbe Martens

Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Prost, Lourie and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: When another patent for a drug issues after an ANDA is filed, there can...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - 2017 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP

Smart & Biggar on

The year 2017 was one of the most significant years for Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law in Canada’s history. The year saw major developments in patent linkage, patent term, and substantive patent issues. As we...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Civ. No. 15-cv-1455 (WCB), 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51851 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 19, 2016) (Bryson, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Restasis® (cyclosporine...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Timing Is Everything – Meeting the One-Year Filing Deadline for IPR - Lannett Holdings Inc. v. AstraZeneca AB

Addressing the one-year time bar for filing an inter partes review (IPR) petition, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found petitioner’s arguments regarding proper service and jurisdiction unpersuasive and...more

McDermott Will & Emery

ANDA Update - October 2015

McDermott Will & Emery on

Federal Circuit Interprets Statutory Requirements for Biosimilar Regulatory Pathway - Amgen Inc., v. Sandoz Inc., (Fed. Cir. July 21, 2015): In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal...more

Troutman Pepper

Analysis of Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review in the Life Sciences Industry Through First Quarter 2015

Troutman Pepper on

The recently established inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) of the America Invents Act have been in the spotlight lately, especially now that the life sciences industry has begun to utilize these...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., Nos. 14-935-LPS, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4056 (D. Del. Jan. 14, 2015) (Stark, C.J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Ampyra® (dalfampridine); U.S. Pats. Nos....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Forest Labs., Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Forest Labs., Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, Civ. No. 14-508-LPS, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23215 (D. Del. Feb. 26, 2015) (Burke, M.J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Namenda XR® (memantine hydrochloride); U.S....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Senju Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. Metrics, Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Senju Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. Metrics, Inc., Civ. No. 14-3962-JBS/KMW, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41504 (D.N.J. Mar. 31, 2015) (Simandle, J.) ....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Apotex Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Can a Federal district court ever have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear a declaratory judgment action of non-infringement for a disclaimed patent? Of course, the Federal Circuit explained this week in the Apotex Inc. v....more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide