News & Analysis as of

Independent Contractors ABC Test CA Supreme Court

Independent contractors are individuals or entities that perform work for other individuals or entities, but are not employees of those individuals or entities. Whether a worker is an employee or an independent... more +
Independent contractors are individuals or entities that perform work for other individuals or entities, but are not employees of those individuals or entities. Whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor is not always an easy determination. However, due to differences in tax and liability treatment, misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor can have serious consequences. Autonomy is the defining feature of independent contractor arrangements. Independent contractors control the manner and method of how work is performed while payers control the desired result. Control over schedule and number of hours worked, ownership of equipment or tools, permanency of relationship, and acceptance of jobs from multiple entities are all possible factors in determining whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor.   less -
McGlinchey Stafford

Court Upholds Law Classifying App-Based Drivers as Independent Contractors: Does What Happens in California, Stay in California?

McGlinchey Stafford on

The California Supreme Court recently upheld a California law that classifies drivers for app-based transportation companies, such as Uber, Lyft, or DoorDash, as independent contractors and not employees, provided the company...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Proposition 22 Survives: App-Based Rideshare and Delivery Companies May Continue to Properly Classify Drivers as Independent...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a substantial win for app-based rideshare and delivery companies, the California Supreme Court unanimously upheld California Proposition 22 as constitutional on July 25, 2024. California Ballot Initiative Proposition 22...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

California Supreme Court Delivers Big Win for Gig Companies

On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 22, the law allowing gig economy workers to be classified as independent contractors. The decision ends a nearly four-year legal...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

California Supreme Court Upholds App-Based Driver Worker Classification Statute

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion upholding the statewide ballot measure that classifies app-based drivers as independent contractors. Voters passed the law (also known as Proposition 22) in...more

Weintraub Tobin

Where Agreements Won’t Work – A Word to the Wise Regarding Strict Wage and Hour Liability and Related Claims

Weintraub Tobin on

I. SYNOPSIS- Ed was a vibrant and healthy 85-year-old. One day, he decided to sign an advance healthcare directive providing that if his physical condition ever declined, he wished to remain in his home as long as...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

AB 5 Past and Present – What You Need to Know

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

At the end of 2020, it seemed the legislature, the courts, and even California voters wanted to move away from the independent contractor test codified in Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5). However, during 2021, the pendulum seems to...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

7-Eleven Prevails in Employee Misclassification Suit

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A federal court for the Central District of California in Haitayan v. 7-Eleven, Inc. has ruled in favor of franchisor 7-Eleven and against four franchise owners who claimed they were employees under California law rather than...more

ArentFox Schiff

California Judge Enjoins Proposition 22 as Unconstitutional in Classifying App-Based Drivers as Independent Contractors

ArentFox Schiff on

In November 2020, California voters passed a ballot initiative, Proposition 22, by an overwhelming majority. Proposition 22 exempts certain app-based drivers from the requirements of California’s Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) by...more

Snell & Wilmer

Not So Fast: California Judge Strikes Down Proposition 22, Finding That Rideshare and Delivery Drivers Are Employees—Not...

Snell & Wilmer on

The road to independent contractor status for rideshare and food delivery drivers working for companies like Uber, Lyft, and Grubhub in California has been neither smooth nor inexpensive. After spending more than $200 million...more

K&L Gates LLP

California's Preemption Analysis Creates Circuit Split Making AB-5 Ripe for Supreme Court Review

K&L Gates LLP on

On 30 April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued the seminal decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, adopting the “A-B-C Test” for determining independent contractor status in the state. The A-B-C...more

ArentFox Schiff

Ninth Circuit Rules California’s AB5 Will Apply to Motor Carriers

ArentFox Schiff on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a long-awaited decision on the question of whether AB5, California’s strict independent contractor misclassification statute, may be applied to motor carriers, or whether the...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

California Employment Roundup: Q1 2021

Independent contractors, meal periods, and PAGA. The first quarter of 2021 yielded some key rulings from the California appellate courts on independent contractor classification, meal-period rounding, and arbitration of...more

McDermott Will & Emery

AB 5 Contractor-Classification Battles Set to Heat Up in 2021

Employers grappling with independent-contractor classification had a busy 2020—and should expect a flurry of additional activity this year. Few areas in employment law are changing as rapidly. Last year, many concerned about...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Worker Classification: A Pre- And Post-COVID-19 Challenge For Real Estate Industry

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

While some say “COVID-19 has changed everything,” a couple of issues for real estate employers are unchanged. First, in the brokerage world, properly classifying agents as independent contractors, instead of employees,...more

Troutman Pepper

California Supreme Court Clarifies Dynamex’s “ABC” Test, Concluding that Independent Contractor Status Applies Retroactively

Troutman Pepper on

Q: Does the “ABC test” for independent contractor status in the state of California apply retroactively? ...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Proposition 22 Challenged in Oakland State Court

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Last November, California voters convincingly (almost 60% supporting) enacted Proposition 22.  This Proposition was a well-funded effort that allows gig drivers working for companies like Uber, Lyft and Doordash to avoid the...more

Fisher Phillips

Once-Pivotal Grubhub Case Back On The Court Docket – But Has The Gig Economy Moved On?

Fisher Phillips on

A federal appeals court just resurrected a pivotal gig economy battle that at one time seemed to be the center of the legal universe – but for a variety of reasons seems much less important these days. The 9th Circuit Court...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: California’s Dynamex/ABC Test is Retroactive

Lewitt Hackman on

In 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the ABC Test announced in a California Supreme Court decision, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.5th 903 (2018) could apply to franchise...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

California Supreme Court Rules Dynamex Decision Applies Retroactively | Newsletters | Legal News: Distribution & Franchise

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The California Supreme Court has followed up on its groundbreaking decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.5th 903 (2018), which imposed the so-called “ABC Test” for determining whether a worker is...more

K&L Gates LLP

The Past Looks like the Present: The California Supreme Court Determines that the Dynamex Decision on Independent Contractor...

K&L Gates LLP on

On 14 January 2020, the California Supreme Court held that its earlier landmark decision setting forth the definitive rule for independent contractor classification, Dynamex Ops. W. Inc. v. Superior Court, 416 P.3d 1 (2018),...more

ArentFox Schiff

California Rules 'ABC' Independent Contractor Test Applies Retroactively

ArentFox Schiff on

In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018), the California Supreme Court held that any individual who performs work for a person or entity is presumed to be an employee who falls within the...more

Alston & Bird

The California Supreme Court Holds That Its Worker Classification Decision in Dynamex Is Retroactive

Alston & Bird on

Looking back, the California Supreme Court doubles down on its decision to retroactively impose the state’s ABC test for workers. Our Labor & Employment Group delves into what the future holds for employers, employees, and...more

Snell & Wilmer

California Supreme Court Rules That Dynamex ABC Test Applies Retroactively

Snell & Wilmer on

On January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court ruled in Vazquez et al. v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Case no. S258191, that the Dynamex ABC Test, which makes it harder for companies to classify workers as...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Supreme Court Rules Dynamex ABC Test is Retroactive

Fenwick & West LLP on

The California Supreme Court held on January 14, 2021, that its landmark Dynamex decision, which established a rigid standard under California law for companies to classify workers as independent contractors, and later was...more

Perkins Coie

California’s Supreme Court Confirms the Retroactivity of the ABC Test Established in the 2018 Dynamex Decision

Perkins Coie on

On January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court decided Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. The decision holds that the ABC test used to determine independent contractor versus employee status for purposes of...more

200 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide