News & Analysis as of

Insurance Industry Policy Terms Duty to Defend

Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP

Insurer Must Defend Hotel from Allegations of Sex Trafficking, Northern District of Georgia Rules

In a recent opinion, the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has ordered an insurer to defend an insured hotel from allegations that it negligently or intentionally permitted a minor to be trafficked for sex...more

Cozen O'Connor

The Time Limited Demand and Duty to Settle: Common Themes and Advising Your Insurer Client How to Avoid Bad Faith

Cozen O'Connor on

There must be something in the water or the plaintiff’s bar just had a conference where the keynote speaker addressed strategies for putting pressure on insurers by issuing time-limited demands (“TLD”) because we have been...more

Cozen O'Connor

Claims Notes: September 2024

Cozen O'Connor on

Litigation arose over whether a suit for misrepresentation and breach of contract arising out of an easement triggered a Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurer's duty to defend. Internal confidential communications...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insured’s “Version of Events” Do Not Determine Application of Policy Exclusion

Wiley Rein LLP on

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, applying New Jersey law, has held that a misappropriation of funds exclusion unambiguously barred coverage for an accounting firm under its professional liability policy...more

Robinson+Cole Construction Law Zone

Water Alone is Not Property Damage Under a CGL Policy in Connecticut

The Connecticut Appellate Court recently provided guidance on what does not constitute property damage under a typical contractor’s Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance policy in Westchester Modular Homes of Fairfield...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update - June 2024

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The parent of an infant sued Kim Eichle for Eichle’s alleged negligence in serving alcohol to her houseguest, Jacob Russo, who allegedly assaulted the infant, and for negligence in failing to keep the sidewalk at her...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

Do You Have Choice of Counsel in Insurance Litigation?

Warner Norcross + Judd on

Do you know which attorneys will represent your interests if your insurance provider has to defend you in litigation? You might be surprised. As a general rule, liability insurance policies – such as those held by family...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Court Holds Retroactive Date Exclusion Is Ambiguous Under California Law

Wiley Rein LLP on

A federal district court, applying California law, has determined that an insurer owed a duty to defend because the policy’s retroactive date exclusion was ambiguous in that it could reasonably be interpreted to apply only to...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update — Compilation 2023

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The owners hired a general contractor (GC) insured by Amerisure to build a movie theatre, and the GC hired a masonry subcontractor (Sub) insured by Selective under a primary and umbrella policy...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update - July 27, 2023

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Southern District Holds That Contractor’s Carrier Has Duty To Defend ConEd Even Though Contractor’s Work Ended Months Before The Accident-A pedestrian tripped and fell on a Bronx sidewalk, and she sued the owner of the...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update — Compilation 2022

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Technology Insurance Company, as the liability insurer for a landlord, filed a declaratory judgment action against Main Street America Assurance Company, as the liability insurer for the landlord’s tenant, seeking a...more

Carlton Fields

New York Federal Judge Finds No Duty to Defend Based on War Exclusion’s Insurrection Clause

Carlton Fields on

In Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. The Western Union Co. et al., No. 22-CV-0557 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 2022), a federal judge in New York granted Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and motion...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer’s Declaratory Judgment Complaint Plausibly Alleges Violation of Cooperation Clause at Motion to Dismiss Phase

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, has held that an insurer’s complaint plausibly alleged that the insured had breached the terms of the policy’s cooperation clause....more

McGuireWoods LLP

Beyond the Eight Corners: Determining Whether a Liability Insurer’s Duty to Defend Is Triggered

McGuireWoods LLP on

In two recent decisions, the Texas Supreme Court defined the limited parameters in which Texas courts can look beyond the “four corners” of the complaint against the policyholder and the “four corners” of the insurance policy...more

Locke Lord LLP

The Texas Supreme Court Approves the ‎Broader Use of Extrinsic Evidence to Determine ‎an Insurer’s ‎Duty to Defend

Locke Lord LLP on

The Texas Supreme Court recently issued two opinions expanding the use of extrinsic evidence to determine an insurer’s duty to defend third-party claims. Monroe Guar. Ins. Co. v. BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., No. 21-0232, 2022 WL...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Wrongful Acts Alleged in Class Action Based on Corporate Policy Are Not “Related Acts”

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has held that an insurer has a duty to defend its insured’s subsidiary in a class action lawsuit that alleges wrongful conduct that occurred prior to the...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Obligations of Insurer and Policyholder E-book

Foley Hoag LLP on

The liability insurance relationship is primarily one of contract, with the insurance policy as the principal source of the parties’ obligations. As with other types of insurance, the duties of the parties—and the...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer Has Duty to Defend Suits Seeking Only Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Wiley Rein LLP on

An Illinois appellate court has held that a professional liability insurer has a duty to defend suits seeking only declaratory and injunctive relief, even though the suits did not allege potentially covered damages.  MHM...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Where Policy Contains no Duty to Defend, Reasonableness of Insurer’s Decision to Withhold Consent to Settlement Judged from...

Wiley Rein LLP on

In answering a certified question from the Ninth Circuit, the Arizona Supreme Court has held that, where the policy contains no duty to defend, the objective reasonableness of an insurer’s decision to withhold consent to...more

White and Williams LLP

Insurer Owes Defense Despite "Extrinsic Evidence," New York Court Holds

White and Williams LLP on

An insurer’s duty to defend generally is based on a comparison of the complaint against the insured and the insurance policy language. However, in some jurisdictions, an insurer may consider "extrinsic" evidence — information...more

White and Williams LLP

CGL Coverage and Coronavirus: Is Causing Exposure an “Occurrence”?

White and Williams LLP on

There is only one thing that can be said for sure about the extent of consequences — human and economic — of the new coronavirus outbreak. Nobody knows. But, as things stand now, minor, and even moderate, have left the barn. ...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Fifth Circuit Decision Excluding Coverage under Pollution Exclusion for Damage to Stream Caused by Rock Fines

In a sweeping decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit extended the absolute pollution exclusion to the unplanned discharge of “rock fines,” pellets produced during quarry operations, and denied coverage for...more

Troutman Pepper

Federal Court in North Carolina Enforces Insurers’ Duty to Defend a General Contractor as an Additional Named Insured Under the...

Troutman Pepper on

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Weaver Cooke Constr., LLC, 2019 BL 129431 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2019) - This case arises out of the alleged defective construction of a condominium complex in North Carolina. In 2009, the developer on...more

Troutman Pepper

Boring Through The Details: U.S. District Court Declares Boring Company Dispute Not Covered by Insurance Policies

Troutman Pepper on

Maxum Indemnity Co. v. Robbins Co., P.C., No. 1:17-CV-01968, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57729 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 28, 2018) - On March 21, 2018, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granted a motion...more

40 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide