News & Analysis as of

Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding › Printed Matter Doctrine › Intellectual Property Protection

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Interpreting the Printed Matter Doctrine in Inter Partes Review

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

In Ioengine, LLC v. Ingenico Inc. No. 2021-1227, 2021-1331, 2021-1332 (Fed. Cir. May 03, 2024), the case addresses the patentability/validity of three patents. In particular, this case discusses the application of the printed...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit Finds Application of Printed Matter Doctrine Too Expansive

Jones Day on

During an inter partes review (IPR) initiated by Ingenico, the PTAB found certain claims from three patents held by IOEngine to be unpatentable. The patents at issue are directed to secure communications for portable devices...more

Troutman Pepper

CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision That Printed Matter Doctrine Can Be Used In Claim Construction

Troutman Pepper on

In an inter partes review proceeding, a challenger cannot raise patent-eligibility as a ground of invalidity. Rather, the invalidity grounds are limited to lack of novelty and obviousness. ...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide