News & Analysis as of

Interlocking Directorate Enforcement Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Biden Administration’s “Extensive Review of Interlocking Directorates Across the Entire Economy” May Put Your Board...

The identification, investigation and removal of persons who serve as directors or officers of two competing companies (i.e., “horizontal interlocks”) is a significant component of the Biden Administration’s antitrust...more

WilmerHale

ABA Spring Meeting Sessions: Key Highlights From US Antitrust Enforcers’ Statements (April 10-12, 2024)

WilmerHale on

Below is a summary of some of the most important points made by antitrust enforcers who participated in panels at the ABA Antitrust Section’s annual Spring Meeting....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Increase in HSR Reporting Thresholds and Filing Fees; Other HSR Developments

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In January 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) made three important announcements for M&A practitioners....more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

2023 Chemicals & Energy Antitrust Report

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

For companies in the energy and chemical sectors, the potential for antitrust scrutiny is an ever-present concern. The next round of enforcement inquiries is never further away than the next jump in commodity prices or the...more

Lippes Mathias LLP

FTC Enforces Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act

Lippes Mathias LLP on

It has been over 40 years since the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has enforced Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits interlocking directorates among competing businesses, specifically referring to boards of...more

Holland & Hart LLP

DOJ Ups the Enforcement Ante on Interlocking Directorates

Holland & Hart LLP on

Over the past year, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division has renewed enforcement efforts against “interlocking directorates” that violate Section 8 of the Clayton Act.  This provision prohibits directors and...more

ArentFox Schiff

Most Significant Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Changes in Decades Signal Rise in Antitrust Enforcement, and Need for Enhanced M&A...

ArentFox Schiff on

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced revised jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act. These include annual revisions to filing thresholds and a new six-tier filing fee...more

BCLP

Picking the Locks: Recent DOJ Enforcement of Clayton Act’s Prohibitions on Interlocking Directorates

BCLP on

The business community was put on notice last week after the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the resignations of seven directors from five corporate boards following what DOJ called the “first in a broader review of...more

Smith Anderson

Justice Department’s Investigation of “Interlocking Directorates” Leads to Corporate Board Resignations

Smith Anderson on

​​​​​​​Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 (Section 8) prohibits directors and officers from serving simultaneously on the boards of competing corporations, subject to limited exceptions. Specifically, Section 8...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Private Equity Subject to Increased Antitrust Scrutiny from DOJ

Foley Hoag LLP on

Transactions involving private equity should expect to face antitrust concerns from the DOJ that go beyond the question of how many competitors will remain afterwards, even if the transactions do not trigger an HSR filing. ...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide