News & Analysis as of

Investment International Trade Commission (ITC) Patents

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Stretching the Limits: Clarifying the Scope of the Domestic Industry Requirement

Complainants should allocate their investments on a patent-by-patent basis, or, at a minimum, ensure that any aggregate investment is allocated by proper product groupings....more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

ITC suggests 5% Threshold for Domestic Industry Assessment; order may impact tech companies

Recently, Chief Administrative Law Judge (“CALJ”) Bullock of the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”), in Certain Carburetors and Products Containing Such Carburetors, Inv. No. 337-TA-1123, Order No. 77, suggested that...more

Jones Day

Research Prototypes Count Towards Domestic Industry

Jones Day on

In a recent opinion, the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) held that economic investments and activities related to patented pre-commercial and non-commercial articles can meet Section 337’s domestic industry...more

Jones Day

Economic Prong of Domestic Industry Requirement Is Not Evaluated in Relation to Complainant’s Overall Investments

Jones Day on

Administrative Law Judge Lord held the economic prong can be satisfied even when the percentage of complainant’s domestic investments in the patented products is small in relation to its overall domestic investments. In re...more

Jones Day

ITC Makes It Easier for Complainants to Meet the Domestic Industry Requirement

Jones Day on

In a recent decision, the Commission overruled the ALJ to clarify, and ultimately expand, the universe of investments that complainants can use to meet the economic prong of the domestic industry (“DI”) requirement. Certain...more

Jones Day

Discontinued Products Count Towards Domestic Industry

Jones Day on

In a recent Initial Determination (“ID”), Chief Administrative Law Judge Bullock held that the “greater weight of authority” supports the conclusion that investments in discontinued products can form the basis for an existing...more

Jones Day

ALJ Finds Violation in Mobile Device Holders Investigation

Jones Day on

ALJ Pender’s initial determination in Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1028 (Sept. 12, 2017), finding a violation of Section 337, provides important guidance on what investments count...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide