Hsu Untied interview with Mike Burshteyn, Partner at Greenberg Traurig
Hsu Untied interview with David Elihu, Partner at Quinn Emanuel
The Intersection of Recovery and Performance: Insights from an Ironman Attorney - On Record PR
Trial by Tech: The Evolution of the Digital Courtroom – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Hsu Untied interview with Erik Puknys, Partner at Finnegan
Hsu Untied interview with Tim Lohse, Partner at Manatt
Episode 84: Vilius Bernatonis | TGS Baltic
Hsu Untied interview with Brad Kondracki, Partner at MoFo
Hsu Untied interview with Jordan Jaffe, Partner at Wilson Sonsini
Hsu Untied interview with Derek Foran, Partner at Steptoe
Hsu Untied interview with Dana Wagner, Chief Legal Officer at Twilio
A Journey from Guyana to the Boardroom with Kelly-Ann Gibbs Cartwright
Inspiring Inclusion: Creating a Culture of Action and Accountability - Passle's CMO Series REPRESENTS
Hsu Untied interview with Karen Abesamis, Partner at Morgan Lewis
Hsu Untied interview with Sepideh Mousakhani, Partner at Cooley
Hsu Untied interview with David Okano, Partner at White & Case
Hsu Untied interview with Karen Ubell, Partner at Goodwin
Hsu Untied interview with Bradley Krack, Partner at Gunderson Dettmer
Hsu Untied interview with Dan Cunha, General Counsel at Quora
Hsu Untied interview with Jae Lee, Partner at Nelson Mullins
The clash between the public's “right to know” and the interest of parties in keeping information from the public is a recurring issue. This program will give an overview of “both sides” and will examine, among other things,...more
Join our panel of distinguished attorneys from across the globe to explore how attorney-client privileged communications and work product protections are defined and applied across jurisdictions. Panelists from the United...more
In an age of digital transformation, the legal industry is increasingly thinking about using AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT for document review, legal research, and even writing legal briefs. Yet, in our...more
Legislation must show a clear, explicit and unequivocal intention to abrogate privilege before a party is required to disclose privileged information, the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterated in its recent decision of Ontario...more
Consider the scenario in which opposing counsel provided a settlement offer that the client approved, but the lawyer has not communicated its acceptance to opposing counsel prior to the client’s death. A zealous advocate may...more
We wrote last July about a draft California ethics opinion regarding clients who may have diminished mental capacity. After receiving public comment, the State Bar’s Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and...more
Why You Should Attend: Lucian Pera provides a wide-ranging, thorough review of the most important developments over the last year in legal ethics, the law of lawyering, and attorney-client privilege. In the one-hour...more
At first glance, TikTok might not have obvious utility to the working professional. After all, its pandemic-era popularity seems to be the product of Zoom-schooled and homebound Gen Zers who flocked to the app as a new...more
What are the ethical obligations of a California lawyer for a client with diminished mental capacity? The ethics committee of the State Bar of California answers this key question in draft Formal Opinion No. 13-0002, with...more
Confidentiality is fundamental to the client-lawyer relationship. It encourages candid communication between client and lawyer and assists the lawyer in more effectively representing the client. In this episode, McGlinchey...more
Confidentiality is fundamental to the client-lawyer relationship. Are you talking to your lawyer within earshot of a family member or a third person? Are you talking to your lawyer within earshot of a listening device?...more
• The American Bar Association (ABA), on March 6, 2018, issued Formal Opinion 480, which specifically examines confidentiality obligations for lawyer blogging and other public commentary. • Notably, the opinion recites the...more
In a December 5, 2016 decision, a Connecticut trial court (Huddleston, J.) addressed the limitations on the Connecticut Commissioner of Consumer Protection in enforcing a so-called "investigative demand" served under the...more