News & Analysis as of

Manufacturers Supreme Court of the United States

Troutman Pepper

Industry Urges SCOTUS to Consider FDA Graphic Cigarette Warnings

Troutman Pepper on

In August, a group of tobacco companies filed a petition for certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of a lower court’s holding that the First Amendment does not prohibit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Purdue Pharma Plan Blocked, Supreme Court Bars Third-Party Releases in Bankruptcy

A sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court has barred the issuance of non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 Plans. In a 5-4 decision, the court held that “the bankruptcy code does not authorize a release and injunction...more

Robinson+Cole Manufacturing Law Blog

A New Supreme Court Case Could Take a Toll on Copyright Trolls

We have seen a noticeable uptick in lawsuits commenced by “copyright trolls” in recent years, including against businesses in the manufacturing space. The Supreme Court is currently considering a case that could have a...more

Venable LLP

Could Texas Ban the Sale of Union-Made Goods? After National Pork Producers, We Still Don’t Know

Venable LLP on

The Supreme Court’s opinion last week in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross raises more questions than it answers regarding what state laws might violate the dormant Commerce Clause. California prohibits the in-state...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Podcast: The Legal Battle Over Mifepristone - Diagnosing Health Care

On April 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to preserve access to the prescription abortion drug mifepristone. However, while the case continues in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the future of...more

Gardner Law

Transatlantic Legal-Regulatory Update: Live from the Heart of Silicon Valley

Gardner Law on

US and EU Life Sciences Law firms Fieldfisher & Gardner Law recently held a CLE event in Silicon Valley covering Healthcare Compliance, Data Privacy and Regulatory hot topics for MedTech and Pharma companies. Discussion...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

For Sale or Not for Sale? Consider a Patent Application First

Amundsen Davis LLC on

For sale, or not for sale- That is the question in Larry G. Junker v. Medical Components Inc. et al., case that started in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and which has now been appealed to...more

ArentFox Schiff

CY 2023 Proposed HOPPS Rule– What Drug Manufacturers Need To Know

ArentFox Schiff on

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its annual proposed rule related to the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems for 2023 (the HOPPS Proposed Rule) on...more

Smith Gambrell Russell

Is Your Product Really “Made in the USA?” The FTC is Asking.

Smith Gambrell Russell on

The FTC is serious about enforcing the Made in USA Labeling Rule. On April 12, 2022, the DOJ, on behalf of the FTC, sued Lithionics Battery LLC and its owner, Steve Tartaglia, in the United States District Court for the...more

Robinson+Cole Manufacturing Law Blog

Supreme Court Halts Implementation of OSHA ETS

We take a break from our regularly scheduled “2022 outlook” programming to bring you breaking news on the seesaw that is the enforcement of OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) regarding COVID-19 vaccination or testing....more

White and Williams LLP

Where Can Your Company Be Sued? A 2022 Update on All Things Personal Jurisdiction

In 2021, thanks to the seventh “personal jurisdiction” opinion decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in just over a decade, as well as some state-based legal developments, we now have firm guidelines about where all types of...more

Robinson+Cole Manufacturing Law Blog

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on Two Federal Vaccine Mandates

On December 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court took its first step into the fray over federal vaccine mandates. As we have previously posted, legal challenges to the Biden administration’s various vaccine mandates have been...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Managing Your Dealer Council to Avoid Antitrust Risks

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Dealer groups and dealer councils can serve invaluable pro-competitive purposes but – if not staying within legal bounds – they can create significant antitrust risk. What’s more, that risk may extend beyond the participating...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

A Component Part Supplier’s Duty to Warn Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Maritime Asbestos Decision

Under the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 5, Comment b (1998), the supplier of a product generally must warn about only those risks associated with the product itself, not those associated with the...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Product Liability Update - April 2021

Foley Hoag LLP on

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT - • United States Supreme Court Holds Due Process Permits Exercise Of Specific Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-Of-State Vehicle Manufacturer For Product Liability Claims For Harm To Forum...more

Butler Snow LLP

Navigating the Stream of Commerce: “Purposeful Availment” in the Wake of Ford

Butler Snow LLP on

We recently covered the United States Supreme Court’s troubling decision in Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, 141 S. Ct. 1017 (2021), which has broadened the reach of specific personal jurisdiction...more

Hogan Lovells

Coronavirus: The Hill and the Headlines, April 2021

Hogan Lovells on

In Washington: Congress returns this week from their two-week spring recess.   The Senate will continue its consideration of President Biden’s health care nominees.   On April 15, the Senate Finance Committee will consider...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Writ of Certiorari in Boeing/Rolls Royce Case to Consider Arguments on Interpretation of 28 U.S.C. §1782

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

On March 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petitioner’s request for Writ of Certiorari in the ServoTronics, Inc. v. Rolls-Royce, PLC case....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

The Supreme Court Expands The Jurisdictional Reach Of The Courts: Implications For Aviation?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The United States Supreme Court handed down a decision yesterday that expands the reach of state courts over companies involved in interstate commerce. While the decision, Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court to Hear Specific Personal Jurisdiction Product Cases That Caused Harm in Forum States

Cozen O'Connor on

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a manufacturer’s challenge to two state supreme court decisions (Minnesota and Montana) that allowed plaintiffs to bring product defect suits in states where the manufacturer...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Third Circuit Clarifies Next Steps in Fosamax Decision

On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has in turn remanded the case to the district court to determine whether state law claims are preempted by federal law in the 500+...more

Sunstein LLP

Federal Circuit Astonishingly Invalidates Manufacturing Method Patent…

Sunstein LLP on

In a breathtaking decision, the Federal Circuit has ruled that a patented method of making an automobile drive shaft is not eligible to be patented because it is “directed to a natural law.” In so ruling, the court has...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

Product Lines - Toxic Torts and Products Liability Insights: Issue 2, 2019

Welcome to the second 2019 issue of Product Lines – our quarterly e-newsletter that focuses on toxic torts and products liability issues. For this edition, we are reporting on several important and timely legal issues. As...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Worth the Wait? Some Semi-Mature Thoughts on Albrecht

For some long-awaited events, a little time and distance can add a measure of clarity. Not always – many still are processing the Game of Thrones finale, with no end in sight. But over the past few weeks pharmaceutical...more

Butler Snow LLP

No Way Around It: The Need for Federal "Permission and Assistance" Can Preempt a State Tort Duty

Butler Snow LLP on

In the simplest case for federal preemption, federal law prohibits conduct that a state tort duty would require, such as a change in the design of an approved medical device to cure an alleged defect. Because federal law is...more

94 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide