News & Analysis as of

Marijuana Related Businesses Tax Deductions Business Expenses

McGlinchey Stafford

Paid or Incurred: Marijuana Rescheduling, Taxes, and Section 280E

McGlinchey Stafford on

The cannabis industry knows well the economic burden imposed by Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code). It substantially increases the cost of doing business because it disallows deductions for expenses...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Blazing Trails: Exploring ESOPs in the Cannabis Industry

The budding cannabis industry, despite its rapid growth and gradual acceptance in recent years, still faces a major sustainability challenge: Cannabis businesses cannot deduct most ordinary business expenses. Under Internal...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

In NYC, Cannabis Business Expenses Now Deductible

Rivkin Radler LLP on

New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a bill on Friday, November 20, 2023, that allows New York City cannabis businesses to deduct business expenses paid or incurred in carrying on such business for purposes of determining...more

Miller Canfield

Does a Tax Cut Jobs Act Provision Decrease Income Taxes on Marijuana Businesses?

Miller Canfield on

Key Takeaways: ..A pending U.S. Tax Court case presents an interesting theory to preclude the federal income tax disallowance of all deductions of a marijuana business. ..The theory rests on a provision in the 2017 Tax...more

Freeman Law

Section 280E and The Taxation of Cannabis Businesses

Freeman Law on

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits taxpayers who are engaged in the business of trafficking certain controlled substances (including, most notably, marijuana) from deducting typical business expenses...more

Holland & Knight LLP

IRS Continues to Audit and Litigate Against Cannabis Businesses

Holland & Knight LLP on

As Congress continues to deliberate the federal legalization of marijuana, the cannabis industry continues to face scrutiny from the IRS under Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Enacted in 1982 in response to a...more

Burns & Levinson LLP

There’s Always Certainty in Taxes: IRS Issues Tax Guidance for the Marijuana Industry

Burns & Levinson LLP on

During these unpredictable times, there is certainty in taxes. This month the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) posted a dedicated marijuana-industry specific webpage providing general tax guidance and FAQs for the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Section 280E – Why Are We Still Having This Discussion?

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

If you are in the cannabis industry, you should already know Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code. It consists of only one sentence...more

Lowndes

Tax Court Strikes a Blow to Medical Marijuana Industry, Although Dissents Offer Some Hope

Lowndes on

As more and more states are allowing legal use of marijuana, medical marijuana businesses are faced with large tax bills because of marijuana’s continued classification as a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. ...more

Dickinson Wright

No Penalties in Harborside Case

Dickinson Wright on

Last week, a tax court decided that California cannabis company Harborside Inc. owes approximately $11 million in income tax payments after a ruling last year that Code Section 280E (which disallows deductions for businesses...more

Burns & Levinson LLP

Alpenglow at It Again

Burns & Levinson LLP on

As discussed in more detail in my prior post, Alpenglow Botanicals (“Alpenglow”) is a state licensed Marijuana dispensary based in Colorado. Alpenglow was audited for several tax years and the IRS made adjustments, denying...more

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP

Section 280E Remains a Problem for Maryland Cannabusinesses: How to Minimize Taxable Income through Proper Classification of...

The Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission (“the MMCC”) recently reported to the Maryland legislature on “the deleterious effects of the federal tax code on medical cannabis businesses.” As stated in its report, I.R.C. § 280E...more

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP

Recent Report from Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission on Compassionate Use Fund Highlights Disparate Tax Treatment of...

In a December 2018 letter to Governor Hogan, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House, the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission (“MMCC”) discussed plans to fund the Compassionate Use Fund. As medical...more

Lowndes

Tax Court Decision Another Blow to Medical Marijuana Industry

Lowndes on

The recent Tax Court decision, Alterman v. Commissioner, struck yet another tax blow against the growing medical marijuana industry. ...more

Cozen O'Connor

Federal and Pennsylvania Tax Deduction Limitations on Medical Marijuana Businesses

Cozen O'Connor on

The growing, processing, dispensing, and use of medical marijuana became legal in Pennsylvania on May 18, 2016, under the Medical Marijuana Act, Act 2016-16 (S.B. 3), 35 P.S. § 10231.101, et seq. (the Act). Medical marijuana...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide