News & Analysis as of

Medical Expenses › Medicare › Appeals

Snell & Wilmer

Redefining the Rules: How Audish v. Macias Reshaped Future Medical Expense Claims in California Personal Injury Cases

Snell & Wilmer on

In Audish v. Macias (2024) 102 Cal.App.5th 740, the California Court of Appeal decided a key issue concerning the admissibility of a plaintiff’s future Medicare eligibility in calculating damages for future medical expense...more

Tyson & Mendes LLP

Audish v. Macias Builds Upon the Foundation Started in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provision, Inc.

Tyson & Mendes LLP on

Earlier this year, the Fourth District Court of Appeal decided Audish v. Macias. This groundbreaking case builds upon the foundation started in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provision, Inc. by clarifying the application of the...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Eleventh Circuit Finds Medicare Secondary Payer Act Not Preempted by Procedural Requirements

Rumberger | Kirk on

This past week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that private causes of action brought under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSP Act) are not preempted by contractual and state procedural...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Can Tort Victims Recover the Total Amount of Medical Expenses Billed?

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

Good news for defendants. The Court of Special Appeals recently decided that the Medicare Secondary Payer Act does not preempt the Maryland statute that allows post-trial motions to reduce judgments for past medical expenses....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide