News & Analysis as of

NAD Puffery

BakerHostetler

Drink It In: NAD Showers Us with Another ‘Best’ Claim Case

BakerHostetler on

When it rains, it pours! We just wrote about the National Advertising Division’s (NAD) beef jerky case finding that most claims of “clearly better” were boastful puffs and not comparative claims. But before we fully digested...more

BakerHostetler

A Meaty New Puffery Case to Sink Your Teeth Into

BakerHostetler on

It’s the age-old banter between the marketing team and the marketing lawyers. The song and dance goes something like this...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD Considers Whether ​“Better” and ​“Best” Claims are Puffery

Royal Oak sells Super Size charcoal briquets that are 50% bigger than the briquets sold by certain competitors. Royal Oak advertises that ​“a bigger briquet is a better briquet” and that the briquets provide ​“the best...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] 7th Annual Forum on Advertising Claims Substantiation - February 8th - 9th, New York, NY

While the modalities of advertising may change, advertising’s core tenant of claims substantiation remains an unwavering constant. As such, legal and regulatory professionals in marketing and advertising set their calendars...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Best Guesses for “Best” Claims

If you want to advertise that something is the “best,” do you need substantiation? Or can you rely on a puffery argument? Although the answer depends on context, one paragraph in a recent NAD decision seems to conflict with...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD Combs Through Saturday Night Hair Claims

My law firm picture was taken on a Tuesday morning, but I’ve always lamented that the photographer wasn’t available to take it on a weekend, which would have given me a better opportunity to showcase my Saturday night hair....more

BakerHostetler

AD-ttorneys@law - June 2022

BakerHostetler on

Plaintiffs’ bar goes after Ricola for promoting inactive ingredients - Please Ignore This Section if You Are Easily Annoyed - Let’s unpack, for just a moment, one of the most oft-cited television commercials of all...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

NAD Resolves Dispute Between Competing Sports Drinks

Claims by BodyArmor Nutrition, LLC, for BodyArmor SuperDrink and BodyArmor Lyte sports drink were challenged by Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. (SVC), maker of Gatorade sports drinks, at the National Advertising Division (NAD)....more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Cover Your Eyes: NAD Recommends Pepper Spray Discontinue Claims

The National Advertising Division (NAD) has recommended that an advertiser discontinue performance claims for its pepper spray in a challenge brought by a competitor....more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Not the NARB’s Favorite: Pasta Claims Should Be Discontinued

The National Advertising Review Board (NARB) agreed with the National Advertising Division (NAD) that Goya Foods Inc. failed to support its objective preference claim that its Excelsior brand pasta is “La Pasta favorita de...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD Opines on “Favorite” Claims

The line between what’s an objective claim (which does require proof) and puffery (which does not require proof) isn’t always clear, and reasonable minds can differ as to on which side of the line a claim belongs. When the...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

‘Puerto Rico’s Favorite Pasta’ Is Not Puffery, NAD Says

Weighing in on a pasta advertising dispute, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Goya Foods discontinue claims that its Excelsior brand pasta was “Puerto Rico’s favorite pasta” in a challenge brought by...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

A Call to ‘Upgrade’ Can Be Puffery, NAD Says

In a mixed decision addressing puffery, the National Advertising Division (NAD) found that a claim made by Kraft Heinz on point-of-sale (POS) displays for its Heinz Real Mayonnaise constitutes puffery, but may also be an...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

NAD Refers BodyArmor Claims to FTC After Review

After BA Sports Nutrition declined to comply with the National Advertising Division’s (NAD) recommendations to modify or discontinue certain ad claims for its BodyArmor SuperDrink, the self-regulatory body referred the claims...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Advertising Litigation Report: Vol. 2, No. 1

Lanham Act False Advertising - Lanham Act Liability for Native Advertising Violations - Casper Sleep, Inc. v. Mitcham, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, No. 16 Civ. 3224 (JSR), 2016 WL 4574388 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2016) - ...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Advertising Law - August 2016 #2

Electric Toothbrushes Battle It Out Before NAD - In a battle over electric toothbrushes, the National Advertising Division determined that Procter & Gamble can support superiority claims for its Oral-B models challenged...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Retail and Consumer Products Law Roundup - November 2015

We are pleased to share with you the first issue of Manatt's Retail and Consumer Products Law Roundup. The newsletter will be published on a monthly basis and will survey topics of critical importance to the retail,...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Advertising Law - October 2015 #2

"Flying Rabbi" Suit Crash Lands in NY Appellate Court - A New York man was unsuccessful in his lawsuit accusing Jimmy Kimmel of misappropriating his image during a skit on the late night TV show, Jimmy Kimmel Live! ...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide